“The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum. That gives people the sense that there's free thinking going on, while all the time the presuppositions of the system are being reinforced by the limits put on the range of the debate.” ~Noam Chomsky
The December 14, 2012, Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting—in which the perpetrator, Adam Lanza, shot and killed his mother at home, 20 school children, 6 teachers, and then himself—received international attention. Governments and world leaders offered their condolences, while tributes and vigils by people were made in honor of the victims. U.S. President Barack Obama gave a televised address on the day of the shootings, saying, "We're going to have to come together and take meaningful action to prevent more tragedies like this, regardless of the politics."
Adam Lanza was allegedly so competent with computers that the FBI couldn’t recover information from his PC. Yet, he had no Twitter, Facebook or Myspace, or social media of any kind. Neighbors reported him to be a 'gamer', yet there are no records of his gaming online. He was admitted to Western Connecticut State University in 2009, and maintained a 3.26 GPA including an A in Computer Science. Despite this, he only graduated sophomore in high school, and was allegedly autistic.
There were no pictures of Adam Lanza in the Newtown yearbook (but his markedly generic ID for something called the ‘Newtown Technology Team’ was found in his room after the crime), just as there is no footage of him going toward or entering Sandy Hook Elementary that day, no gun shop footage either, because the guns belonged to his mother. No pictures of carnage can be seen anywhere, other than glass allegedly broken by an AR15 (we'll get there later). In the distance from his house to Sandy Hook Elementary, Adam would’ve passed a total of 8 other schools. Why enter this one?
A picture of the gun in the trunk (courtesy of The New York Post) looks suspiciously planted. It looks like a Russian Molot Vepr 12, it’s a very unlikely weapon for a single mom from New England. Look at the cleanliness of Lanza’s mom’s car:
In the below video, you can hear a reporter say “assault rifle” in discussion of the shotgun. No one is calling a shotgun an assault rifle in this debate.
They were obviously, at first, trying to build the narrative that:
His mom was a teacher and he was autistic and angry and he was gonna take it out on other teachers and students. He used an AR-15 to kill lots of kids, ergo we need to get rid of the AR-15, it could happen to you!
Then, when some elements were botched, like putting the ‘long weapon’ in the trunk, or the inability to produce a teaching record for Mrs. Lanza, or the lack of any record of him buying rifles, and the unlikeliness of killing ones self with an AR-15, they had to cover those tracks, through a disinformation campaign.
The reality after that narrative was dismissed was that Nancy Lanza was a stockbroker and “firearms enthusiast” who taught Adam how to shoot at a nearby gun range. How coincidental! This single mom found the time in between being a stockbroker to teach a 20 year old how to shoot an AR-15 so accurately that he was able to kill 20+ people without missing one. I shot expert in the military, one of about three of my whole division who did, and I’m telling you I could not kill 20 people with an AR-15, with no knowledge of their heights or positions, with no one just injured or maimed, and I’ve been shooting since i was 10, and was taught by a male who was a military Commander; my dad, who was trained by his dad, who was an Olympian. No way the shooting happened exactly the way they are explaining.
Now consider this NBC news piece on the subject:
According to that report, the AR-15 was not even used. Why would they report that damning evidence? The article claims four hand guns were taken into the school, and the AR-15 now was in the trunk. Also, that he tried to buy a rifle in a gun store (which all have security cams, yet no video was produced.. in fact, no video exists of him whatsoever, even though he was in a tech club).
Look at this picture of what they’re saying is his home- utterly sterile, paint-less and poster-less walls, looks like a room they arranged to be barely believable as a living quarters, and pretty much just a spartan room with video games (which the press wants to push as having shaped his homicidal inclinations):
It was first reported that Adam Lanza targeted Sandy Hook because his mom used to be a teacher there. that narrative changed, and that myth was debunked. Why not immediately? No motive has been determined for the shooting, and it kinda sounds like the mother-as-a-teacher story was an attempt at molding one.
Adam Lanza’s death certificate was amended before being released on a Freedom of Information Appeal. The initial certificate that was provided claimed he died 12/13/12, when the actual shootings were alleged to have happened the next day. He had no funeral.
There was a new security system at Sandy Hook Elementary by all accounts, including bullet proof glass. Yet, Adam was able to get in with at least two guns, the AR-15 that he used to shoot kids and the handgun he used to shoot himself. The CBS affiliate reporter Tony Aiello reported that Adam was let in because he was recognized as a child of a teacher at the school. This is obviously false, why would they report that? Business Insider reported Lanza was wearing a black mask why would they let him in? Aiello’s report alone proves that there was a conspiracy to frame the narrative with Nancy Lanza as a teacher, potentially at Sandy Hook.
Though over 150 shots were allegedly shot, all witnesses only report hearing "a gun shot" or "two gun shots" at most (over an intercom). Then it was reported that only two handguns were used in the killings, and that the AR-15 was left in the car. When you watch the footage of the retrieval of the gun, you can see clearly it's a shotgun.
Sandy Hook Elementary had just installed a new security system, with bulletproof glass, which an AR-15 can NOT shoot through.
CNN reported Adam Lanza grabbed three guns from the house; 2 pistols and an AR15. If a shotgun was collected from the trunk, did his mom just happen to have a shotgun in her car for no reason? On top of that, at 20 years old Lanza knew how to shoot three different types of guns without any assistance (none of which can shoot through bulletproof glass).
Adam Lanza was 20 years old when he allegedly shot himself in the school. Yet, no photos or footage exist of the suicide, not on any deep web or darker side of the internet either. No suicide note exists. When I google Columbine Massacre, I can see the two shooters bloody corpses, who were younger than Lanza.. Why do they not scrub those, if it's about detesting gun violence, or respect for families? I can see Kurt Cobain’s dead body, except for his missing face, on hundreds of media platforms out there, no one seems to be ‘respecting’ his millions of fans, or young daughter. Note that at Lanza’s house, investigators at the scene were able to photograph his Newtown Technology Team ID (with his ridiculously canned looking face, exceptionally clearly printed name, etc.):
CNN reported Alex Israel was a classmate of Lanza’s, and she claimed he was 'different' and agreed that he excelled 'at math,' and claimed "there was something off about him".. when interviewed by Piers Morgan. Yet, she was actually only his classmate in elementary school. She later says, "I mean I was never in any of his classes".. Alex also claimed that Nancy Lanza was a kindergarten teacher in the interview- there's that narrative again- she was not ever a teacher. Sounds like CNN had a half baked narrative there, that didn’t work and had to be ditched. Israel claims that Lanza was “(i would say) a genius… a little bit above the rest of us.” Ok, so you made that assertion from elementary school classes, huh. What did he do, sculpt play-doh in an exceptional way? Did he count to 12 like, really fast?
.
Alyson Wyatt was one of the victims of the shooting. The Daily Mail posted this image of Alyson along with a story about the shooting.
But there's a problem. This isn't Alyson Wyatt. A mother named Cathy Gaubert spotted the photo of her daughter, whose name is Lily, and the article, and was understandably alarmed. Alyson has a memorial website where you can send money, yet the parents are never shown anywhere. Could this be because of the photo fiasco, and not wanting to raise the profile there?
The photo for Alyson was subsequently changed on all searchable sites to this one, search for yourself:
On YouTube, the documentary on the subject, Newtown, is broken into segments. Under each segment are a series of comments, the top comments always being a user such as @harlandscabbard8271, always a throw away sounding account with noother comments, videos or playlists and few subscribers. This is evidence of astroturfing, a technique in which comments are ‘baited’ so that opposition to the narrative can be oppressed or monitored.
Francine Wheeler's 6-year-old son was killed, i guess. Listen to her say "That’s so hurtful" in the most nonplussed way regarding accusations it's a hoax:
I can see with my own eyes that she has an Internet Movie Database account. She is an actor. So does her husband. He “ worked for twenty years in New York City as an actor in theater, film and television.” according to this article.
The Wheelers had moved to Newton the previous April according to this Connecticut Post article (and the top 4 Google searches, are they all not fact checked?), yet, in the family’s scene from Newton, the film on the subject, they have his height recorded in the Newtown house in 2009. Hmm. Looks like he grows about a foot in that period as well, even though he died when he was 6 years old.
Francine worked for Maureen White, a finance chair for the Democratic National Committee who was even invited to the White House by the Clintons. Maureen White is married to controversial Wall Street figure Steven Rattner, who was a member of Democrats for Bloomberg. Rattner played a part in a kickback scheme involving democratic funds. Rattner also worked for Obama.
Another sandy hook mother, Nicole Hockley, also has an IMDB page, and has been an actor. Yet another Sandy Hook mother, Laura Phelps, has acted under the name Jennifer Sexton.
Notice the central reaction of all parents was "lets get some gun legislation passed". There are no enraged parents, only calm, mid 40s people who are forgiving and zen. None of them blame the school for letting Lanza in (who did not have an ID, which is required for entrance), no one blames the media for its depiction, nothing. Just the chorus of gun legislation calls. Every mother is a Live Laugh Love kinda mother, none cry when talking about their kids being slaughtered. Listen to this piece from Scarlett Lewis, one of the mothers who tells us that her son wrote "Nurturing. Healing. Love" on their family chalkboard “shortly before he died”. She says that if Adam Lanza got those things the tragedy would never have happened. Does anyone get angry about child slaughter in this town?? They all act like it’s just a life lesson, and almost every parent has a forgiveness narrative toward Adam Lanza and his dad.
“Their little bodies…riddled with bullets… it’s like, unimaginable! It happens all the time!” Who the f*ck talks like that, especially if your own son was killed in an incident like this? Obviously it’s imaginable to you because it happened to you. You don’t hear rape victims say, “Me, raped.. in my own neighborhood! It’s unimaginable!” Then to continue, “It happens all the time!” is a clearly drive-the-cause-home way of framing it. Who would care how often it happens if it was a personal tragedy for you? No one says, “I just got robbed! Did you know robbery happens all the time?” It simply glows of acting, every suspicious independent non-profit that arose from the event, and the commercial-like editing of every piece on the subject notwithstanding.
Listen to her say, “Jesse was shot in the forehead? In his first grade classroom?” as if she was coached to emphasize the most emotion-grabbing aspects of the language of the event. Who talks that way, about dead children? She claims to have talked to classmates of Adam, who expressed that he was in a “tremendous amount of pain”, and thus she forgives him. What? What classmates? So the best Piers Morgan can do is a classmate of his in elementary school, but this lady can get a private audience with his real classmates, and then just come to terms with him slaying her son because he was sad?
The aftermath led to families insisting on background checks for gun purchasing. Adam Lanzas guns belonged to his mom allegedly. She would've passed a background check and the shooting would've happened exactly the same way. So what's with the rally cry for gun legislation? It would have been perceived as a mental health issue much more than a gun thing if the events occurred just as covered by media.
Micheal Moore has said that he wants to publish the Sandy Hook bodies, riddled in gore, as he said in his Op-Ed “America, You Must Not Look Away (How to Finish Off the NRA)”. He claims the violence as shown regarding The Vietnam War, and the Civil Rights Movement, led to swaying public opinion and change. Still, Sandy Hook parents refused. If they’re so adamant about gun control being the central argument, why not?
In January 2013, New York became the first U.S. state to enact legislation. The Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement (SAFE) Act passed in the state Senate 43-18 on January 15 and cleared the New York State Assembly after about five hours of debate on Tuesday, January 16. It was signed by Governor Andrew Cuomo one hour later. The act expanded the definition of assault weapons banned in New York, created a state database for pistol permits, reduced the maximum number of rounds legally allowed in magazines to seven from ten, and required universal background checks on all gun sales.
Late on April 4, 2013, the Maryland General Assembly passed Governor Martin O'Malley's gun control bill, the Firearm Safety Act of 2013. It bans the purchase of 45 types of assault weapons and limits gun magazines to 10 rounds. It requires handgun licensing and fingerprinting for new gun owners
In the early morning hours of April 4, 2013, the Connecticut General Assembly passed new restrictions to the state's existing assault weapons ban. Governor Dannel Malloy signed them into law later the same day.[40] The law banned the sale or purchase of magazines capable of holding more than ten rounds of ammunition like those used in the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting, and required universal background checks for all firearm purchases.
The chief medical examiner on the shooting was Dr. H Wayne Carver. He allegedly oversaw the conditions of the bodies of more than 20 children less than 24 hours before this video. When asked what the children were wearing, he says, “kid stuff.” When asked what caliber were the bullets, he says (after many literal ‘uh’s) there were “lots of them”. How is that possible if they were all killed with the AR-15? “I don’t know yet” was the answer to the question, “Did the gunman kill himself with the rifle?” Would it not be pretty obvious right away if the gunman was killed by the rifle?
Yet MSNBC reported that an AR-15 killed the kids. How did they know, when the medical examiner of the children did not know? And why, of all possible guns here, that is, a couple handguns, a shotgun, and an AR-15, that it just so happens that Lanza used the AR-15? This is the very gun that Democratic President Clinton targeted as an ‘assault rifle’ with legislation, after which a Republican Congress allowed that ban to lapse and become null. What are the odds that very gun be used?
Dr. Carver claims in this video, “I dunno there were lots of them” when referring to the caliber of bullets. Excuse me, what? If an AR-15 killed all of the children, .224 caliber bullets should be the only ones used. This contradicts his claim that he “probably know(s) more about firearms than most pathologists”.
According to the final medical report, it took 11 minutes to kill all 26 people, obviously of different statures and in different places, and all were killed, none just maimed or injured. There were no survivors with gun shot wounds. Despite part of the ‘hero’ story of Jessie Lewis who allegedly told other kids to run when Lanza opened fire, apparently none did.
The narrative transforms into:
“some kind of long weapon or long gun was used”
This slowly paved the way for the AR-15 to be targeted. “(Everyone except Lanza’s) death was caused by gunshot wounds” was the medical examiners summation, yet, the shotgun was in the car?
Ask yourself this simple question, if nothing else is compelling for you:
If the medical examiner says everyone died from shotgun wounds, why is the AR-15 the focus of the campaign for legislation?
Then there’s the case of Dawn Hochsprung, the alleged Principal of Sandy Hook Elementary (who had only worked there for two years), who was killed in the shooting. Media reported an image of Hochsprung days after the event. The Boston Marathon bombing took place during the Boston Marathon on April 15, 2013. FOX News reported the same image as a victim of those attacks.
The plot thickens, when, if you ever allege because of this connection that Sandy Hook was fake on social media like Facebook or Instagram, your post will be blocked for spreading ‘fake news’. Why can FOX News spread fake news containing a dead Principal’s image, but a citizen can’t post a ‘conspiracy’ post which, if untrue, damages no one? Why doesn’t Dawn Hochsprung’s family sue FOX? Why can’t I sue FOX for falsely reporting this?
Or, does this image show a woman who did not die in either event but is used for both, because they mixed up ‘Jane Doe’ style pictures they had for such crimes?
The most infamous actor involved is Robbie Parker, who is perhaps the most suspicious element of the official story. Here's what you are to believe:
27 people were killed, and their bodies were kept in the school until all bodies were identified (what?).
Robbie Parker, father of one of the children, walks out of the very building full of dead kids, including the corpse of his own daughter. He is obviously and visibly smiling and laughing. When he sees cameras are on him, he asks "start?" and begins crying and giving a one-way, scripted-sounding monologue about the circumstances.
If you believe that's not an actor, I highly advise you evaluate your sense of reality. Literally everything about his 180 degree emotional turn is acting, and corny acting at that. Parker makes the following claims about his 6 year old deceased daughter, who was in first grade:
“Emile was a mentor to her two little sisters, delighting in teaching them how to read, dance, and find the simple joys in life. Emilie’s laughter was infectious.. she was beautiful, blonde, always smiling, bright blue eyes.”
“Emile was always willing to try new things.. other than food” that pedantic detail is an obvious attempt at trying to ‘fill out’ her personality. If Emile was real and was just murdered again, less than 24 hours earlier, are you really going to think to elaborate on her dietary preferences?
For being six years old, Emilie’s personality was very developed. The blonde and bright blue eye claims are obviously to build a mental image that the general public would sympathize with; who describes their dead daughters hair and eye colors? Much like Scarlett Lewis’ claims, Parker emphasizes his daughters physical features. This is presumably so the audience watching at home builds a personal image of her, and thus sympathizes. Parker brought up the Emilie Parker Fund on Facebook twice in a less-than-10-minute-speech.
Parker, like almost all of the other families, had only moved to Newtown in 2012, the year of the shooting! If that were you (and not an actor) wouldn’t you be at least somewhat gobsmacked by this town and be a little less confident in your stances? The claim is he moved there for a job, a residency as a physicians assistant. So I am to believe he moved there and in less than one year, his daughter was killed at school. Were all the daughters enrolled? He had a whole life infrastructure there within a year: housing, education, job?
If the official story is to be believed, there are three Parker daughters, and, days after the first one was murdered, Robbie Parker and his wife dressed a different daughter up in the dead sisters outfit for this photo op with Obama:
Alex Jones had to pay $965 Million dollars to the families as part of an anti defamation suit. On what planet does one owe $965 Million for alleging anything? If I think Apollo 11 was fake, should I pay Buzz Aldrin three digits of millions of dollars, regardless of whether I'm right or wrong? This is called free speech, it is absolutely protected under the first amendment of the constitution, and it is an extremely alarming precedent that it is being eroded over this super suspicious case.
Suppose every element of the official story is true- which is very hard to swallow- does Alex Jones really deserve financial chastising to the tune of $965 million, given that you can see with your own eyes most of his case for skepticism? Could it be that Alex Jones is paying for meddling in the affairs of the ruling forces? Being punished for his exposé on Bohemian Grove or something to that effect?
During the Alex Jones trial, they played some of his Infowars content that shows Anderson Cooper using a green screen (his nose disappears in the frame) for Sandy Hook interviews.
This is absolutely true. Look at this video of Anderson Cooper reporting from 'Gaza'. Focus your eyes on the fuzzy edges of his clothing. When the blast lights up the entire background, none of the light reaches Cooper. The edges of his clothing gets fuzzy every time he moves, this should not occur for whatever level of high definition we would expect from a major news outlet.
His canned reaction is show biz, reminiscent of this other fake news report from CNN wherein Charles Jaco pretends that a gasmask and a WWII style helmet will protect you from a SCUD missile:
In other instances you can see participants in CNN stories being coached by ‘journalists’:
In its 10-year search for Osama bin Laden, the United States spent more than $450 billion. Yet, CNN's Peter Arnett was able to get an interview with Bin Laden in 1997. Bill Clinton claimed he did not pursue Bin Laden because “he’d have had to kill innocent women and children” PRIOR to 9/11.. Really? So why did they not just send some military along with the CNN reporter and capture him? Save however many millions of lives? Conservative radio host William Cooper (who was later killed by government agents) predicted that Bin Laden would be blamed for 9/11, why did Clinton not have the same predictive abilities, with the largest intelligence apparatus the world has ever known at his disposal?
In 1996, American officials described Bin Laden as “one of the most significant financial sponsors of Islamic extremism in the world,” yet somehow CNN could just mosey on in one year later, and were granted an interview. If you were Bin Laden, planning on attacking the World Trade Center, would you just casually grant an interview to CNN? Why essentially warn your target, and what do you have to gain from speaking to their press?
There are declassified government documents that refer to something called the CNN Effect as a means of controlling populations, so, do not doubt that has already been understood from on high. Was CNN trying to use this incident to fortify Anderson Cooper as an important journalist? The only reason ‘fake news’ cannot be punished in this country is a series of legal loopholes regarding the first amendment, it’s all technically free speech. Yet, under these last two administrations, public opinion has been weaponized by the CNN effect against citizens trying to implement the same right. If you dare say Sandy Hook was fake, or that there is a concerted attempt by a deep state to get legislation passed, most Americans boo and hiss to the tune of ‘you’re a conspiracy theorist’. Still, it either did or did not happen, and what kind of person are you if you do not think it is worth investigating, but merely trusting the government is satisfactory?
Below is a video showing groups of people being led in what seems to be a circle around the school that day. To make it look like lots more people were being evacuated, the conspiracy alleges:
Though a helicopter covered the scene for media, no Life Star Helicopters for trauma victims were brought in to lift any of the victims from the scene, though it is the fastest and most effective way of evacuating! There are no pictures of any bodies, covered, bagged, or anything. No blood, anywhere.
Anderson Cooper is central to this whole plot. A CNN reporter but more importantly a Vanderbilt, Cooper had a perfectly timed letter-from-a-child moment that is highly suspect (so this child comprehends the gun control debate, and also that cops and the military can have guns, but citizens should not huh?):
So, currently, they are running this girl across the media landscape. An MSU student named Jackie Matthews who says she ‘survived the tragedy at Sandy Hook’ and has thus survived two mass shootings! Here’s the catch, Matthews was a student at Reed Intermediate School (a nearby school in Newtown, Conn.), which was placed on lockdown on Dec. 14, 2012. She did not attend Sandy Hook:
The families received a $7.1 Million federal grant, for what, I’m not sure. If you’re very confident it happened though, feel free to donate even more money to the “nonprofit” in the families name.
There were 600+ students in Sandy Hook Elementary that day, yet there are no pictures that represent that number, nor are there a giant group of people who were in the school, but not harmed. Curious, there should be, out of 600 people, at least 10 who would talk to the press.. Only a handful of ambulances, much less than what would be necessary for so many murders, were ever photographed. Each ambulance can fit 3 people maximum.
So much about Sandy Hook has been scrubbed from the internet that obviously, the official narrative needed to change its story a few times. If there are no lies involved, why scrub any zany conspiracy, the truth will rise to the top right? RIGHT? No one tries to remove Lizard People content from the internet, because, though that theory is dismissed as antisemitic, it doesn’t challenge the narrative du jour. If no-so called conspiracy theories were true, would it not be better for the case, revealing ‘conspiracy theorists’ to be the dumb knee-jerk sensationalists they are dismissed as, and thus making gun control legislation more sane-seeming? Yet, an incredible censorship campaign was launched, calling anyone who asked questions ‘harassers’, etc.
Lt. J. Paul Vance was commanding officer for the State Police Public Information Unit at Sandy Hook. He should know everything about how the carnage was dealt with; cleaned up, how the bodies were disposed, etc. However, he has never commented about any scene cleanup of any kind.
The way that governments pull off hoaxes is through Compartmentalization. Through this technique, each player is only given a piece of the whole picture, on a need-to-know basis. This way, the right hand is observed while the left hand does the necessary actions taken to manufacture a believable scenario. Sandy Hook smells strongly of compartmentalization, in that, though there were over 600 students at Sandy Hook, only a small group were killed, only a small number of people saw the bodies, and almost no one saw the gunman. As opposed to more obviously true scenarios, like Columbine, where many, many students, faculty, parents, etc. can be found to back up every aspect of the story. Is it possible that the Obama administration was keenly aware of the response to Columbine, and needed something similar to push gun legislation?
If everyone’s rights are affected, every aspect should be open to the public- going to the school, seeing every piece of media associated, seeing photos of death. Everything should be, legally, available if it affects constitutional rights. I can look at John F. Kennedy’s corpse every day with a single Google search, but for some reason, I cannot see any violence associated with this charade.
Crisis Acting is not a conspiracy that ‘crazy’ right wing nuts ‘believe’. Look at this website, crisiscast.com, and their introduction to their services:
“We simulate crisis incidents across multiple platforms for emerging security needs in the UK, Middle East and worldwide. Our specialist teams – many with security clearance – are trained by behavioural psychologists and rigorously rehearsed in criminal and victim behaviour to help police, the army and the emergency services, hospitals, schools, local authorities, government, private security firms, shopping centres, airports, big business, criminal justice departments, media and the military.”
If it’s all true and there’s no conspiracy afoot, lets just go to the school and take some samples and pictures and such, and set this ‘conspiracy theory’ to rest! Oh wait, we cannot, because the government is melting down and demolishing the school, and the demolition team had to sign NDAs. Nothing suspiciously reeks of ‘government cover up’ there. Columbine High School was not demolished, it still stands, and none of the gore is or will be scrubbed from the internet.
The scariest thing about Sandy Hook is that, given the evidence (which is mostly a ‘just trust us’ from local authorities and nationwide media) almost everyone on this earth believes the official story. Scary! Hundreds of news outlets reported on the story. Could diversion from some of Obama’s failures be the motive?
Anyone who questions the narrative is of course a terrorist or whatever. This new nomenclature for anyone who doubts mainstream media assertions, no matter how threadbare, as a ‘truther’, ‘conspiracy theorist’, or ‘terrorist’ is the craziest, scariest garbage ever. Believe these lies, or else! Very, very scary, because though I don’t personally care about gun rights at all, and am for gun control, today it will be a dissolving of the second amendment, tomorrow which? There is no way to go back once a right is removed, and so every single time a right is jeopardized, extreme care should be taken in understanding why. You can almost count on an Invasion of the Body Snatchers style condemnation of anyone with the brain cells to not fall for this sham, this collectivist morality is on the rise. These are the same demagogues that want to arrest people for being skeptical of climate change. There is not ever anything wrong with questioning any narrative that the government or mainstream media circulate, in fact, you should be, if history is any indicator, skeptical of all of them, especially if they infringe upon civil rights.
This is NOT a partisan issue. The government should not require staged events to compel the public, that’s exactly what Hitler did with Operation Konserve, which consisted of a group of 1939 false-flag undertakings planned by Nazi Germany to give the appearance of Polish aggression against Germany. The Germans then used propaganda reports of the events to justify their invasion of Poland, which started on 1 September 1939, and led to Nazi Germany’s poorly planned invasion of Russia, for which reason they were weakened and became a losing force in WWII, simply put. This is also what George W. Bush did to justify the invasion of Iraq. One can be for gun control, left leaning, and still know the difference between a shotgun and rifle.
For the democrats, this fake news story could challenge the hegemony of groups like the NRA in The US who refuse to budge on gun control by saying,“What do you, want more dead kids?” and save Obama’s failing image as someone who was going to rectify problems caused by previous Republican administrations (such as closing Guantanamo, which he did not do, or ending the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, which he exacerbated).
The Smith-Mundt Act of 1948 and Foreign Relations Authorization Act in 1987 were passed to protect U.S. audiences from our own government’s misinformation campaigns. They make propagandizing a federal crime. These Acts were suspiciously amended in 2012.
Never has a President cried over a political issue, not when space shuttle crew died, countries were invaded, not during the AIDS crisis, or any financial meltdown. Yet, Obama was filmed crying over Sandy Hook as a perfectly timed public relations stunt. Notice how he compartmentalizes saying “First graders in Newtown… first graders” and all the cameras go off simultaneously.
It was a good old Public Relations pysop that, at current press time, you face a Wall of Swords for trying to examine or expose. Obama is painted as a hero for saving the children (though he ordered ten times more drone strikes, which included thousands of women and children, in the Middle East than Bush). Why do these killings not make him sad? Obama told White House aides he was “really good at killing people” regarding his drone strike strategy. Hundreds of thousands of children have been killed in the illegal invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan, which Obama exacerbated greatly. Where are the tears for those children? Or do only 27 kids in Connecticut really make him lose it, not at all in a PR way?
You’ve got to ask yourself, when government is willingly to tell such convoluted lies, if the people in power believe the end justifies the means, and if so, what else have they lied about? If this one can be sussed by someone like me, what lies are so beyond me and people like me that we consider them every day common sense? Sandy Hook just goes to show; you can fool some people sometimes, but you can’t fool all the people all the time.
The FBI has a statewide report for violent crimes each year. The 2012 report shows 0 murders in Newtown. The FBI claims this is a clerical error. Of all the places to make such an error, the location of the Sandy Hook shooting is probably not the best one. I don’t know which is worse- an FBI who lies about child murder, or an FBI who can’t even get a nationwide legislation-creating event’s kill count right.