Against the latest court filings by John Durham, highlighting the tip of the political surveillance iceberg, I have been asked to re-post the deep dive into the totality of the scale of the iceberg. I will add some of the latest information into the outline to show how it all connects.
Barack Obama and Eric Holder did not create a weaponized DOJ and FBI; instead, what they did was take the preexisting system and retool it, so the weapons only targeted one side of the political continuum.
Together they recalibrated the domestic surveillance capabilities, the internal spying systems, so that only their political opposition would be targeted. This point is where many people understandably get confused.
In the era shortly after 9/11, the DC national security apparatus was constructed to preserve continuity of government and simultaneously view all Americans as potential threats. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) were created specifically for this purpose.
What Barack Obama and Eric Holder did with that new construct was refine the internal targeting mechanisms so that only their ideological opposition became the target of the new national security system. This is a very important nuance to understand as you dig deeper into this research outline.
Washington DC created the modern national security apparatus immediately and hurriedly after 9/11/01. DHS came along in 2002 and within the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 the ODNI was formed. When Barack Obama and Eric Holder arrived a few years later, those newly formed institutions were viewed as opportunities to create a very specific national security apparatus that would focus almost exclusively against their political opposition.
The preexisting Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and Dept of Justice (DOJ) were then repurposed to become two of the four pillars of the domestic national security apparatus. However, this new construct would have a targeting mechanism based on political ideology. The DHS, ODNI, DOJ and FBI became the four pillars of this new institution. Atop these pillars is where you will find the Fourth Branch of Government.
We were not sleeping when this happened, we were wide awake. However, we were stunningly distracted by the economic collapse that was taking place in 2006 and 2007 when the engineers behind Obama started to assemble the design. By the time Obama took office in 2009, we sensed something profound was shifting, but we can only see exactly what shifted in the aftermath. The four pillars were put into place, and a new Fourth Branch of Government was quietly created.
As time passed, and the system operators became familiar with their new tools, technology allowed the tentacles of the system to reach out and touch us. That is when we first started to notice that something very disconcerting was happening. Those four pillars are the root of it, and if we take the time to understand how the Fourth Branch originated, questions about this current state of perpetual angst will start to make sense.
Grab a cup of your favorite beverage and take a walk with me as we outline how this was put together. You might find many of the questions about our current state of political affairs beginning to make a lot more sense.
Remember, it is not my intent to outline the entire history of how we got to this place where the intelligence community now acts as the superseding fourth branch of government. Such an effort would be exhausting and likely take our discussion away from understanding the current dynamic.
History provided enough warnings from Dwight D. Eisenhower (military) to John F. Kennedy (CIA), to Richard Nixon (FBI), to all modern versions of warnings and frustrations from HPSCI Devin Nunes and ODNI Ric Grenell. None of those prior reference points are invalid, and all documented outlines of historic reference are likely true and accurate. However, a generational review is not useful, as the reference impacting us ‘right now‘ gets lost.
Instead, we pick up the expansive and weaponized intelligence system as it manifests after 9/11/01, and my goal is to highlight how the modern version of the total intelligence apparatus has now metastasized into a Fourth Branch of Government. It is this superseding branch that now touches and influences every facet of our life.
If we take the modern construct, originating at the speed of technological change, we can also see how the oversight or “check/balance” in our system of government became functionally obsolescent.
After many years of granular research about the intelligence apparatus inside our government, in the summer of 2020 I visited Washington DC to ask specific questions. My goal was to go where the influence agents within government actually operate, and to discover the people deep inside the institutions no one elected, and few people pay attention to.
It was during this process when I discovered how information is purposefully put into containment silos; essentially a formal process to block the flow of information between agencies and between the original branches. While frustrating to discover, the silo effect was important because understanding the communication between networks leads to our ability to reconcile conflict between what we perceive and what’s actually taking place.
After days of research and meetings in DC during 2020; amid a town that was serendipitously shut down due to COVID-19; I found a letter slid under the door of my room in a nearly empty hotel with an introduction of sorts. The subsequent discussions were perhaps the most important. After many hours of specific questions and answers on specific examples, I realized why our nation is in this mess. That is when I discovered the fourth and superseding branch of government, the Intelligence Branch.
I am going to explain how the Intelligence Branch works: (1) to control every other branch of government; (2) how it functions as an entirely independent branch of government with no oversight; (3) how and why it was created to be independent from oversight; (4) what is the current mission of the IC Branch, and most importantly (5) who operates it.
The Intelligence Branch is an independent functioning branch of government, it is no longer a subsidiary set of agencies within the Executive Branch as most would think. To understand the Intelligence Branch, we need to drop the elementary school civics class lessons about three coequal branches of government and replace that outlook with the modern system that created itself.
The Intelligence Branch functions much like the State Dept, through a unique set of public-private partnerships that support it. Big Tech industry collaboration with intelligence operatives is part of that functioning, almost like an NGO. However, the process is much more important than most think. In this problematic perspective of a corrupt system of government, the process is the flaw – not the outcome.
There are people making decisions inside this little known, unregulated and out-of-control branch of government that impact every facet of our lives.
None of the people operating deep inside the Intelligence Branch were elected; and our elected representative House members genuinely do not know how the system works. I assert this position affirmatively because I have talked to House and Senate staffers, including the chiefs of staff for multiple House & Senate committee seats. They are not malicious people; however, they are genuinely clueless of things that happen outside their silo. That is part of the purpose of me explaining it, with examples, in full detail with sunlight.
We begin….
In April of 2016, the FBI launched a counterintelligence operation against presidential candidate Donald Trump. The questioning about that operation is what New York Representative Elise Stefanik cites in March of 2017, approximately 11 months later (First Two Minutes).
Things to note:
♦ Notice how FBI Director James Comey just matter-of-factly explains no one outside the DOJ was informed about the FBI operation. Why? Because that’s just the way things are done. His justification for unilateral operations was “because of the sensitivity of the matter“, totally ignoring any constitutional or regulatory framework for oversight; because, well, quite simply, there isn’t any. The intelligence apparatus inside the DOJ/FBI can, and does, operate based on their own independent determinations of authority.
♦ Notice also how FBI Director Comey shares his perspective that informing the National Security Council (NSC) is the equivalent of notifying the White House. The FBI leadership expressly believe they bear no responsibility to brief the Chief Executive. As long as they tell some unknown, unelected, bureaucratic entity inside the NSC, their unwritten responsibility to inform the top of their institutional silo is complete. If the IC wants to carve out the Oval Office, they simply plant information inside the NSC and, from their perspective, their civic responsibility to follow checks-and-balances is complete. This is an intentional construct.
♦ Notice how Comey obfuscates notification to the Director of National Intelligence (DNI), by avoiding the fact James Clapper was the DNI from outset of the counterintelligence operation throughout the remainder of Obama’s term. When I get deeper into the process, we will understand how the Intelligence Branch has intentionally used the creation of the DNI position (established post 9/11/01) as a method to avoid oversight, not enhance it. Keeping an oblivious doofus like James Clapper in position held strategic value [Doofus Reminder HERE].
That video of James Comey being questioned by Elise Stefanik was the first example given to me by someone who knew the background of everything that was taking place preceding that March 20, 2017, hearing. That FBI reference point is a key to understand how the Intelligence Branch operates with unilateral authority above Congress (legislative branch), above the White House (executive branch), and even above the court system (judicial branch).
Also, watch this short video of James Clapper because it is likely many readers have forgotten, and likely even more readers have never seen it. Watch closely how then White House national security adviser John Brennan is responding in that video. This is before Brennan became CIA Director, this is when Brennan was helping Barack Obama put the pillars into place. WATCH:
[Sidebar: Every time I post this video it gets scrubbed from YouTube (example), so save it if you ever want to see it again.]
The video of James Clapper highlights how the ODNI position (created with good national security intention) ended up becoming the fulcrum for modern weaponization and is now an office manipulated by agencies with a vested interest in retaining power. The Intelligence Branch holds power over the ODNI through their influence and partnership with the body that authorizes the power within it, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI).
Factually, the modern intelligence apparatus uses checks and balances in their favor. The checks create silos of proprietary information, classified information, vaults of information that work around oversight issues. The silos are part of the problem.
Ironically, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) was created in the aftermath of 9/11/01 expressly to eliminate the silos of information which they felt led to a domestic terrorist attack that could have been prevented. The ODNI was created specifically upon the recommendation of the 9/11 commission.
The intent was to create a central hub of intelligence information, inside the Executive Branch, where the CIA, NSA, DoD, DoS, and DIA could deposit their unique intelligence products and a repository would be created so that domestic intelligence operations, like the DOJ and FBI could access them when needed to analyze threats to the U.S. This, they hoped, would ensure the obvious flags missed in the 9/11 attacks would not be missed again.
KEY POINT – Prior to the creation of the ODNI, the terror threats were generally considered ‘external‘ threats that would target us. The intelligence products were threat assessments of entities outside the United States, and how they may present a risk to us in America. However, with the creation of the ODNI the terror threat analysis now looked ‘internally‘. This is so very critical an inflection point it must be emphasized.
Prior to the ODNI the intelligence products from the CIA, NSA, DoD, DoS, DIA, were used to protect us (American citizens) from them (foreign actors). After the ODNI was created those same intelligence products were used to look inward, into U.S. citizens, and as an outcome the tools were used to conduct domestic surveillance of threats to government from ‘inside’ actors. They were protecting government from us.
The terror surveillance radar was no longer pointed offshore. After 9/11 the terror surveillance radar was modified to point inland.
Prior to the ODNI, We The People were what the intelligence system was designed to protect. After the ODNI was created, We The People were now defined as the potential threat. The continuity of government was now what needed to be protected…. FROM US!
The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), or Director of National Intelligence (DNI), became the arbiter of information created by institutions that were not previously, constitutionally, allowed to conduct surveillance on U.S. citizens. The NSA data, and all other previously contained tools for terror threat hunting, was now being used by the Dept of Justice and the FBI to look inwardly.
With the constitutional limits around the use of intelligence agencies by the DOJ and FBI now blurred by the elimination of firewalls, the DNI office created a problem. Think of the ODNI as the narrow part of the hourglass. If the DOJ and FBI want to get into the CIA, NSA, DoD, DIA intelligence products they must pass through the ODNI. You’ll see how it was critical to install a person uniquely skilled in being an idiot, James Clapper, into that willfully blind role while intelligence operatives worked around the office to assemble the Intelligence Branch of Government.
Think about what happened at the DOJ and FBI after the ODNI was created. The DOJ began a special unit, the National Security Division (DOJ-NSD) to look secretly at the intelligence material that was previously off-limits for domestic surveillance and targeting. The FBI began counterintelligence operation against American citizens using access to that same intelligence material.
It was only a matter of time before the DOJ-NSD and FBI started to abuse their access to electronic data that was collected exclusively to detect threats from foreign actors. This is where the FISA Court abuses of illegal surveillance of American citizens starts to become exponential.
The DOJ/FBI illegal use of the NSA database is quantified within their own admissions to the FISA Court. Example below shows 85% of all search queries into the database are non-compliant:
♦ The last federal budget that flowed through the traditional budgetary process was signed into law in September of 2007 for fiscal year 2008 by George W. Bush. Every budget since then has been a fragmented process of continuing resolutions and individual spending bills.
Why does this matter? Because many people think defunding the Intelligence Community is a solution; it is not…. at least, not yet. Worse yet, the corrupt divisions deep inside the U.S. intelligence system can now fund themselves from multinational private sector partnerships (banks, corporations and foreign entities).
• When Democrats took over the House of Representatives in January 2007, they took office with a plan. Nancy Pelosi became Speaker, and Democrats controlled the Senate where Harry Reid was Majority Leader. Barack Obama was a junior senator from Illinois.
Pelosi and Reid intentionally did not advance a budget in 2008 (for fiscal year 2009) because their plan included installing Barack Obama (and all that came with him) with an open checkbook made even more lucrative by a worsening financial crisis and a process called baseline budgeting. Baseline budgeting means the prior fiscal year budget is accepted as the starting point for the next year budget. All previous expenditures are baked into the cake within baseline budgeting.
Massive bailouts preceded Obama’s installation due to U.S. economic collapse, and massive bailouts continued after his installation. This is the ‘never let a crisis go to waste’ aspect. TARP (Troubled Asset Recovery Program), auto bailouts (GM), and the massive stimulus spending bill, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA, ie. those shovel ready jobs) were all part of the non budget spending. The federal reserve assisted with Quantitative Easing (QE1 and QE2) as congress passed various Porkulous spending bills further spending and replacing the formal budget process.
Note: There has never been a budget passed in the normal/traditional process since September of 2007.
• While Obama’s radical ‘transformation‘ was triggered across a broad range of government institutions, simultaneously spending on the U.S. military was cut, but spending on the intelligence apparatus expanded. We were all distracted by Obamacare, and the Republican party wanted to keep us that way. However, in the background there was a process of transformation taking place that included very specific action by Eric Holder and targeted effort toward the newest executive agency the ODNI.
The people behind Obama, those same people now behind Joe Biden, knew from years of strategic planning that ‘radical transformation’ would require control over specific elements inside the U.S. government. Eric Holder played a key role in his position as U.S. Attorney General in the DOJ.
AG Holder recruited ideologically aligned political operatives who were aware of the larger institutional objectives.
One of those objectives was weaponizing the DOJ-National Security Division (DOJ-NSD) a division inside the DOJ that had no inspector general oversight. For most people the DOJ-NSD weaponization surfaced with a hindsight awakening of the DOJ-NSD targeting candidate Donald Trump many years later. However, by then the Holder crew had executed almost eight full years of background work.
• The second larger Obama/Holder objective was control over the FBI. Why was that important? Because the FBI does the domestic investigative work on anyone who needs or holds a security clearance. The removal of security clearances could be used as a filter to further build the internal ideological army they were assembling. Additionally, with new power in the ODNI created as a downstream consequence of the Patriot Act, new protocols for U.S. security clearances were easy to justify.
Carefully selecting fellow ideological travelers was facilitated by this filtration within the security clearance process. How does that issue later manifest? Just look around at how politicized every intelligence agency has become, specifically including the FBI.
• At the exact same time this new background security clearance process was ongoing, again everyone distracted by the fight over Obamacare, inside the Department of State (Secretary Hillary Clinton) a political alignment making room for the next phase was being assembled. Names like Samantha Power, Susan Rice and Hillary Clinton were familiar on television while Lisa Monaco worked as a legal liaison between the Obama White House and Clinton State Department.
Through the Dept of State (DoS) the intelligence apparatus began working on their first steps to align Big Tech with a larger domestic institutional objective. Those of you who remember the “Arab Spring”, some say “Islamist Spring”, will remember it was triggered by Barack Obama’s speech in Cairo – his first foreign trip. The State Department worked with grassroots organizers (mostly Muslim Brotherhood) in Egypt, Syria, Bahrain, Qatar and Libya. Obama leaned heavily on the organizational network of Turkish President Recep Erdogan for contacts and support.
Why does this aspect matter to us? Well, you might remember how much effort the Obama administration put into recruiting Facebook and Twitter as resources for the various mideast rebellions the White House and DoS supported. This was the point of modern merge between the U.S. intelligence community and Big Tech social media.
In many ways, the coordinated political outcomes in Libya and Egypt were the beta test for the coordinated domestic political outcomes we saw in the 2020 U.S. presidential election. The U.S. intelligence community working with social media platforms and political operatives.
Overlaying all of that background activity was also a new alignment of the Obama-era intelligence apparatus with ideological federal “contractors“. Where does this contractor activity manifest? In the FISA Court opinion of Rosemary Collyer who cited the “interagency memorandum of understanding”, or MOU.
Hopefully, you can see a small part of how tentacled the system to organize/weaponize the intelligence apparatus was. None of this was accidental, all of this was by design, and the United States Senate was responsible for intentionally allowing most of this to take place.
That’s the 30,000/ft level backdrop history of what was happening as the modern IC was created. Next, we will go into how all these various intelligence networks began working in unison and how they currently control all of the other DC institutions under them; including how they can carve out the President from knowing their activity.
♦ When Barack Obama was installed in January 2009, the Democrats held a 60-seat majority in the U.S. Senate. As the people behind the Obama installation began executing their longer-term plan, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence was a tool to create the Intelligence Branch; it was not an unintentional series of events.
When Obama was installed, Dianne Feinstein was the Chair of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI), and Democrat operative Dan Jones was her lead staffer. Feinstein was completely controlled by those around her including Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. The CIA was in the process of turning over personnel following the Bush era, and as a result of a massive multi-year narrative of diminished credibility (Iraq WMD), a deep purge was underway. Obama/Holder were in the process of shifting intelligence alignment and the intensely political Democrat Leader Harry Reid was a key participant.
THE TRAP – Many people say that Congress is the solution to eliminating the Fourth and superseding Branch of Government, the Intelligence Branch. This is an exercise in futility because the Legislative Branch, specifically the SSCI, facilitated the creation of the Intelligence Branch. The SSCI cannot put the genie they created back in the bottle without admitting they too are corrupt; and the background story of their corruption is way too intense to be exposed now.
Every member of the SSCI is compromised in some controlling manner. Those Senators who disliked the control over them; specifically disliked because the risk of sunlight was tenuous and, well, possible; have either left completely or stepped down from the committee. None of the SSCI members past or present would ever contemplate saying openly what their tenure involved.
[Note: You might remember when Vice Chairman Mark Warner’s text messages surfaced, there was a controlled Republican SSCI member who came to his defense in February of 2018. It was not accidental that exact Senator later became the chair of the SSCI himself. That Republican Senator is Marco Rubio, now vice-chair since the Senate re-flipped back to the optics of Democrat control in 2021.]
All of President Obama’s 2009 intelligence appointments required confirmation from the Senate. The nominees had to first pass through the Democrat controlled SSCI, and then to a full Senate vote where Democrats held a 60-vote majority. Essentially, Obama got everyone he wanted in place easily. Rahm Emmanuel was Obama’s Chief of Staff, and Valerie Jarrett was Senior Advisor.
Tim Geithner was Treasury Secretary in 2010 when the joint DOJ/FBI and IRS operation to target the Tea Party took place after the midterm “shellacking” caused by the Obamacare backlash.
Mitch McConnell was Minority Leader in the Senate but supported the targeting of the Tea Party as his Senate colleagues were getting primaried by an angry and effective grassroots campaign. McConnell’s friend, Senator Bob Bennett, getting beaten in Utah was the final straw.
Dirty Harry and Mitch McConnell saw the TEA Party through the same prism. The TEA Party took Kennedy’s seat in Massachusetts (Scott Brown); Sharon Angle was about to take out Harry Reid in Nevada; Arlen Spector was taken down in Pennsylvania; Senator Robert Byrd died; Senator Lisa Murkowski lost her primary to Joe Miller in Alaska; McConnell’s nominee Mike Castle lost to Christine O’Donnell in Delaware; Rand Paul won in Kentucky. This is the background. The peasants were revolting…. and visibly angry Mitch McConnell desperately made a deal with the devil to protect himself.
In many ways, the TEA Party movement was/is very similar to the MAGA movement. The difference in 2010 was the absence of a head of the movement, in 2015 Donald Trump became that head figure who benefited from the TEA Party energy. Trump came into office in 2017 with the same congressional opposition as the successful TEA Party candidates in 2011.
Republicans took control of the Senate following the 2014 mid-terms. Republicans took control of the SSCI in January 2015. Senator Richard Burr became chairman of the SSCI, and Dianne Feinstein shifted to Vice-Chair. Dirty Harry Reid left the Senate, and Mitch McConnell took power again.
Republicans were in control of the Senate Intelligence Committee in 2015 when the Intelligence Branch operation against candidate Donald Trump was underway. [Feinstein’s staffer, Dan Jones, left the SSCI so he could act as a liaison and political operative between private-sector efforts (Fusion GPS, Chris Steele) and the SSCI.] The SSCI was a participant in that Fusion-GPS/Chris Steele operation, and as a direct consequence Republicans were inherently tied to the problem with President Trump taking office in January of 2017. Indiana Republican Senator Dan Coats was a member of the SSCI.
Bottom line…. When it came to the intelligence system targeting Donald Trump during the 2015/2016 primary, the GOP was just as much at risk as their Democrat counterparts.
When Trump unexpectedly won the 2016 election, the SSCI was shocked more than most. They knew countermeasures would need to be deployed to protect themselves from any exposure of their intelligence conduct. Dianne Feinstein stepped down, and Senator Mark Warner was elevated to Vice Chairman.
Indiana’s own Mike Pence, now Vice President, recommended fellow Hoosier, SSCI Senator Dan Coats, to become President Trump’s Director of National Intelligence (ODNI). [Apply hindsight here]
• To give an idea of the Intelligence Branch power dynamic, remind yourself how House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI), Chairman Devin Nunes, tried to get access to the DOJ/FBI records of the FISA application used against the Trump campaign via Carter Page.
Remember, Devin Nunes only saw a portion of the FISA trail from his review of a Presidential Daily Brief (PDB) previously given to President Obama. Chairman Nunes had to review the PDB at the White House SCIF due to compartmented intelligence, another example of the silo benefit.
Remember the massive stonewalling and blocking of the DOJ/FBI toward Nunes? Remember the back and forth battle over declassification surrounding the Nunes memo?
Remember, after Nunes went directly to House Speaker Paul Ryan for help (didn’t get any), the DOJ only permitted two members from each party within the HPSCI to review the documents, and only at the DOJ offices of main justice?
Contrast that amount of House Intel Committee railroading and blocking by intelligence operatives in the DOJ, DOJ-NSD and FBI, with the simple request by Senate Intelligence Vice Chairman Mark Warner asking to see the Carter Page FISA application and immediately a copy being delivered to him on March 17th, 2017.
Can you see which intelligence committee is aligned with the deepest part of the deep state?
Oh, how quickly we forget:
The contrast of ideological alignment between the House, Senate and Intelligence Branch is crystal clear when viewed through the prism of cooperation. You can see which legislative committee holds the power and support of the Intelligence Branch. The Senate Intel Committee facilitates the corrupt existence of the IC Branch, so the IC Branch only cooperates with the Senate Intel Committee. It really is that simple.
• The Intelligence Branch carefully selects its own members by controlling how security clearances are investigated and allowed (FBI). The Intelligence Branch also uses compartmentalization of intelligence as a way to keep each agency, and each downstream branch of government (executive, legislative and judicial), at arm’s length as a method to stop anyone from seeing the larger picture of their activity. I call this the “silo effect“, and it is done by design.
I have looked at stunned faces when I presented declassified silo product from one agency to the silo customers of another. You would be astonished at what they don’t know because it is not in their ‘silo’.
Through the advice and consent rules, the Intelligence Branch uses the SSCI to keep out people they consider dangerous to their ongoing operations.
Any appointee to the intelligence community must first pass through the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, before they get a full Senate vote. If the SSCI rejects the candidate, they simply refuse to take up the nomination. The president is then blocked from that appointment.
This is what happened with President Trump over-and-over again.
• Additionally, the Intelligence Branch protects itself, and its facilitating allies through the formal classification process. The Intelligence Branch gets to decide unilaterally what information will be released and what information will be kept secret.
There is no entity outside the Intelligence Branch, and yes that includes the President of the United States, who can supersede the classification authority of the Intelligence Branch. {Go Deep} and {Go Deep} This is something 99.9% of the people on our side get totally and frustratingly wrong.
No one can declassify, or make public, anything the Intelligence Branch will not agree to. Doubt this? Ask Ric Grenell, John Ratcliffe, or even President Trump himself.
• The classification process is determined inside the Intelligence Branch, all by themselves. They get to choose what rank of classification exists on any work-product they create; and they get to decide what the classification status is of any work product that is created by anyone else. The Intelligence Branch has full control over what is considered classified information and what is not. The Intelligence Branch defines what is a “national security interest” and what is not. A great technique for hiding fingerprints of corrupt and illegal activity.
[For familiar reference see the redactions to Lisa Page and Peter Strzok text messages. The Intelligence Branch does all redactions.]
• Similarly, the declassification process is a request by an agency, even a traditionally superior agency like the President of the United States, to the Intelligence Branch asking for them to release the information. The Intelligence Branch again holds full unilateral control. If the head of the CIA refuses to comply with the declassification instruction of the President, what can the president do except fire him/her? {Again, GO DEEP} How does the President replace the non-compliant cabinet member? They have to go through the SSCI confirmation. See the problem?
Yes, there are ways to break up the Intelligence Branch, but they do not start with any congressional effort. As you can see above, the process is the flaw – not the solution. Most conservative pundits have their emphasis on the wrong syllable. Their cornerstone is false.
For their own self-preservation, the Intelligence Branch has been interfering in our elections for years. The way to tear this apart begins with STATE LEVEL election reform that blocks the Legislative Branch from coordinating with the Intelligence Branch.
The extreme federalism approach is critical and also explains why Joe Biden has instructed Attorney General Merrick Garland to use the full power of the DOJ to stop state level election reform efforts. The worry of successful state level election control is also why the Intelligence Branch now needs to support the federal takeover of elections.
Our elections have been usurped by the Intelligence Branch. Start with honest elections and we will see just how much Democrat AND Republican corruption is dependent on manipulated election results. Start at the state level. Start there…. everything else is downstream.
♦ People want examples, reference points for work the Intelligence Branch conducts, specifically how it protects itself.
Here is an example: Julian Assange.
Yes, the history of the U.S. national security apparatus goes back decades; however, the weaponization of that apparatus, the creation of an apex branch of government, the Intelligence Branch, originated –as we currently feel it– under President Barack Obama.
Obama took the foundational tools created by Bill Clinton and George W. Bush and used the intelligence system architecture to create a weapon for use in his fundamental transformation. An alliance of ideologues within government (intel community) and the private sector (big tech and finance) was assembled, and the largest government weapon was created. Think about this every time you take your shoes off at an airport.
After the weapon was assembled and tested (Arab Spring), the Legislative Branch was enjoined under the auspices of a common enemy, Donald J. Trump, an outsider who was a risk to every entity in the institutional construct of Washington DC. Trillions were at stake, and years of affluence and influence were at risk as the unholy alliance was put together.
To understand the risk that Julian Assange represented to U.S. Intelligence Branch interests, it is important to understand just how extensive the operations of the FBI/CIA were in 2016.
It is within the network of foreign and domestic intel operations where Intelligence Branch political tool, FBI Agent Peter Strzok, was working as a bridge between the CIA and FBI counterintelligence operations.
By now, people are familiar with the construct of CIA operations involving Joseph Mifsud, the Maltese professor generally identified as a western intelligence operative who was tasked by the FBI/CIA to run an operation against Trump campaign official George Papadopoulos in both Italy (Rome) and London. {Go Deep}
In a similar fashion, the FBI tasked U.S. intelligence asset Stefan Halper to target another Trump campaign official, Carter Page. Under the auspices of being a Cambridge Professor, Stefan Halper also targeted General Michael Flynn. Additionally, using assistance from a female FBI agent under the false name Azra Turk, Halper also targeted Papadopoulos.
The initial operations to target Flynn, Papadopoulos and Page were all based overseas. This seemingly makes the CIA exploitation of the assets and the targets much easier.
HPSCI Ranking Member Devin Nunes outlined how very specific exculpatory evidence was known to the FBI and yet withheld from the FISA application used against Carter Page that also mentions George Papadopoulos. The FBI also fabricated information in the FISA.
However, there is an aspect to the domestic U.S. operation that also bears the fingerprints of the international intelligence apparatus; only this time, due to the restrictive laws on targets inside the U.S., the CIA aspect is less prominent. This is where FBI Agent Peter Strzok working for both agencies was important.
Remember, it’s clear in the text messages Strzok had a working relationship with what he called their “sister agency”, the CIA. Additionally, former CIA Director John Brennan has admitted Strzok helped write the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) which outlines the Russia narrative; and Peter Strzok wrote the July 31st, 2016, “Electronic Communication” that originated FBI operation “Crossfire Hurricane.” Strzok immediately used that EC to travel to London to debrief allied intelligence officials connected to the Australian Ambassador to the U.K, Alexander Downer.
In short, Peter Strzok acted as a bridge between the CIA and the FBI. The perfect type of FBI career agent for the Intelligence Branch and CIA Director John Brennan to utilize.
Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson hired CIA Open Source analyst Nellie Ohr toward the end of 2015; at appropriately the same time as “FBI Contractors” were identified exploiting the NSA database and extracting information on a specific set of U.S. persons, the 2015 GOP candidates for President.
It was also Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson who was domestically tasked with a Russian lobbyist named Natalia Veselnitskaya. A little reported Russian Deputy Attorney General named Saak Albertovich Karapetyan was working double agents for the CIA and Kremlin. Karapetyan was directing the foreign operations of Natalia Veselnitskaya, and Glenn Simpson was organizing her inside the U.S.
Glenn Simpson managed Veselnitskaya through the 2016 Trump Tower meeting with Donald Trump Jr. However, once the CIA/Fusion-GPS operation using Veselnitskaya started to unravel with public reporting… back in Russia Deputy AG Karapetyan died in a helicopter crash.
Simultaneously timed in late 2015 through mid 2016, there was a domestic FBI operation using a young Russian named Maria Butina tasked to run up against republican presidential candidates. According to Patrick Byrne, Butina’s private sector handler [NOTE: remember, the public-private sector partnership], it was FBI agent Peter Strzok who was giving Patrick Byrne the instructions on where to send Butina. {Go Deep}
All of this context outlines the extent to which the FBI/CIA was openly involved in constructing a political operation that eventually settled upon anyone in candidate Donald Trump’s orbit. The international operations of the Intelligence Branch were directed by the FBI/CIA; and the domestic operations were coordinated by Peter Strzok operating with a foot in both agencies. [Strzok gets CIA service coin]
Recap: ♦Mifsud tasked against Papadopoulos (CIA). ♦Halper tasked against Flynn (CIA), Page (CIA), and Papadopoulos (CIA). ♦Azra Turk, pretending to be a Halper asst, tasked against Papadopoulos (FBI). ♦Veselnitskaya tasked against Donald Trump Jr (CIA, Fusion-GPS). ♦Butina tasked against Donald Trump Jr (FBI). All of these activities were coordinated.
Additionally, Christopher Steele was a British intelligence officer, hired by Fusion GPS to assemble and launder fraudulent intelligence information within his dossier. And we cannot forget Oleg Deripaska, a Russian oligarch, who was recruited by Asst. FBI Director Andrew McCabe to participate in running an operation against the Trump campaign and create the impression of Russian involvement. However, Deripaska refused to participate.
All of this foreign and domestic engagement was directly controlled by collaborating U.S. intelligence agencies from inside the Intelligence Branch. And all of this coordinated activity was intended to give a specific Russia influence/interference impression.
♦ The key point of all that background context is to see how committed the Intelligence Branch was to the constructed narrative of Russia interfering with the 2016 election. The CIA, FBI, and by extension the DOJ and DOJ-NSD, put a hell of a lot of work into it.
We also know that John Durham looked at the construct of the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA); and talked to CIA analysts who participated in the construct of the January 2017 report that bolstered the false appearance of Russian interference in the 2016 election. This is important because it ties into the next part that involves Julian Assange and Wikileaks.
On April 11th, 2019, the Julian Assange indictment was unsealed in the EDVA. From the indictment we discover it was under seal since March 6th, 2018:
On Tuesday April 15th more investigative material was released. Again, note the dates: Grand Jury, *December of 2017* This means FBI investigation prior to….
The FBI investigation took place prior to December 2017, and it was coordinated through the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA) where Dana Boente was U.S. Attorney at the time. The grand jury indictment was sealed from March of 2018 until after Mueller completed his investigation, April 2019.
Why the delay?
What was the DOJ waiting for?
Here’s where it gets interesting….
The FBI submission to the Grand Jury in December of 2017 was four months after Congressman Dana Rohrabacher talked to Julian Assange in August of 2017: “Assange told a U.S. congressman … he can prove the leaked Democratic Party documents … did not come from Russia.”
(August 2017, The Hill Via John Solomon) Julian Assange told a U.S. congressman on Tuesday he can prove the leaked Democratic Party documents he published during last year’s election did not come from Russia and promised additional helpful information about the leaks in the near future.
Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, a California Republican who is friendly to Russia and chairs an important House subcommittee on Eurasia policy, became the first American congressman to meet with Assange during a three-hour private gathering at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, where the WikiLeaks founder has been holed up for years.
Rohrabacher recounted his conversation with Assange to The Hill.
“Our three-hour meeting covered a wide array of issues, including the WikiLeaks exposure of the DNC [Democratic National Committee] emails during last year’s presidential election,” Rohrabacher said, “Julian emphatically stated that the Russians were not involved in the hacking or disclosure of those emails.”
Pressed for more detail on the source of the documents, Rohrabacher said he had information to share privately with President Trump. (read more)
Knowing how much effort the Intelligence Branch put into the false Russia collusion-conspiracy narrative, it would make sense for the FBI to take keen interest after this August 2017 meeting between Rohrabacher and Assange, monitor all activity, and why the FBI would quickly gather specific evidence (related to Wikileaks and Bradley Manning) for a grand jury by December 2017.
Within three months of the EDVA grand jury, the DOJ generated an indictment and sealed it in March 2018.
The DOJ sat on the indictment while the Mueller/Weissmann probe was ongoing.
KEY POINT: The predicate for everything in the Trump-Russia narrative was that Russia hacked the DNC servers. The Robert Mueller special counsel would not have existed except for the justification of the DNC hack by Russia as a predicate reason for the entire “Russian Interference in the 2016 Election” narrative. The Trump-Russia narrative was the coverup tool for the surveillance and spying against Trump.
As soon as the Mueller/Weissmann probe ended, on April 11th, 2019, a planned and coordinated effort between the U.K. and U.S. was executed; Julian Assange was forcibly arrested and removed from the Ecuadorian embassy in London, and the EDVA indictment was unsealed (link).
As a person who has researched this fiasco; including the ridiculously false 2016 Russian hacking/interference narrative: “17 intelligence agencies”, Joint Analysis Report (JAR) needed for Obama’s anti-Russia narrative in December ’16; and then a month later the ridiculously political Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) in January ’17; this timing against Assange is too coincidental.
It doesn’t take a deep researcher to see the aligned Deep State motive to control Julian Assange. The Weissmann/Mueller report was dependent on Russia cybercrimes for justification, and that narrative was contingent on the Russia DNC hack story which Julian Assange disputes.
♦ This is critical. The Weissmann/Mueller report contains claims that Russia hacked the DNC servers as the central element to the Russia interference narrative in the U.S. election. This claim is directly disputed by WikiLeaks and Julian Assange, as outlined during the Dana Rohrabacher interview, and by Julian Assange on-the-record statements.
The predicate for Robert Mueller’s investigation was specifically due to Russian interference in the 2016 election.
The fulcrum for this Russia interference claim is the intelligence community assessment; and the only factual evidence claimed within the ICA is that Russia hacked the DNC servers; a claim only made possible by relying on forensic computer analysis from Crowdstrike, a DNC and FBI contractor.
The CIA holds a self-interest in upholding the Russian hacking claim; the FBI holds an interest in maintaining that claim; the U.S. media hold an interest in maintaining that claim. All of the foreign countries whose intelligence apparatus participated with Brennan and Strzok also have a self-interest in maintaining that Russia hacking and interference narrative.
Julian Assange is the only person with direct knowledge of how Wikileaks gained custody of the DNC emails; and Assange has claimed he has evidence it was not from a hack.
This “Russian hacking” claim was ultimately important to the CIA, FBI, DOJ, ODNI and U.K intelligence apparatus, it forms the corner of their justification. With that level of importance, well, right there is the obvious motive to shut Julian Assange down as soon as intelligence officials knew the Weissmann/Mueller report was going to be public.
…. and that’s exactly what they did. They threw a bag over Assange.
♦ COLLAPSED OVERSIGHT – The modern system to ‘check’ the Executive Branch was the creation of the legislative “Gang of Eight,” a legislative oversight mechanism intended to provide a bridge of oversight between the authority of the intelligence community within the Executive Branch.
The Go8 construct was designed to allow the President authority to carry out intelligence operations and provide the most sensitive notifications to a select group within Congress.
The Go8 oversight is directed to the position, not the person, and consists of: (1) The Speaker of the House; (2) The Minority Leader of the House; (3) The Chair of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, HPSCI; (4) The Ranking Member (minority) of the HPSCI; (5) The Leader of the Senate; (6) The Minority Leader of the Senate; (7) The Chair of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, SSCI; and finally (8) the Vice-Chair of the SSCI.
Example: When the Chief Executive (the President) initiates an intelligence operation on behalf of the United States, the President triggers a “finding memo.” In essence, the instruction to the intel agency or agencies to authorize a covert operation. When that process takes place, the Go8 are the first people notified. Depending on the sensitivity of the operation, sometimes the G08 are notified immediately after the operation is conducted. The notification can be a phone call or an in-person briefing.
Because of the sensitivity of their intelligence information, the Gang of Eight hold security clearances that permit them to receive and review all intelligence operations. The intelligence community are also responsible for briefing the Go8 with the same information they use to brief the President.
~ 2021 Gang of Eight ~
The Go8 design is intended to put intelligence oversight upon both political parties in Congress; it is designed that way by informing the minority leaders of both the House and Senate as well as the ranking minority members of the SSCI and HPSCI. Under the concept, the President cannot conduct an intelligence operation; and the intelligence community cannot carry out intelligence gathering operations without the majority and minority parties knowing about it.
The modern design of this oversight system was done to keep rogue and/or corrupt intelligence operations from happening. However, as we shared in the preview to this entire discussion, the process was usurped during the Obama era. {GO DEEP}
Former FBI Director James Comey openly admitted to Congress on March 20, 2017, that the FBI, FBI Counterintelligence Division, DOJ and DOJ-National Security Division, together with the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) and the CIA, had been conducting independent investigations of Donald Trump for over a year without informing the Go8. Comey justified the lack of informing Go8 oversight by saying, “because of the sensitivity of the matter.”
Stupidly, Congress never pressed James Comey on that issue. The arrogance was astounding, and the acceptance by Congress was infuriating. However, that specific example highlighted just how politically corrupt the system had become. In essence, Team Obama usurped the entire design of congressional oversight…. and Congress just brushed it off.
Keep in mind, Comey did not say the White House was unaware; in fact he said exactly the opposite, he said, “The White House was informed through the National Security Council,” (the NSC). The very direct and specific implication; the unavoidable implication and James Comey admission that everyone just brushed aside, was that President Obama’s National Security Advisor, Susan Rice, was totally informed of the intelligence operation(s) against Donald Trump. After all, the NSC reports to the National Security Advisor.
That is why Susan Rice’s attorney could never allow her to appear before a congressional inquiry.
Look at that highlighted box from Susan Rice’s lawyer, Kathryn Ruemmler, and remember in his March 20, 2017, testimony Comey said, “The White House was informed through the National Security Council,” (the NSC).
FBI Director James Comey was protecting himself against the spygate surveillance of Trump, by leveraging his prior notification to the White House. Comey was signaling, ‘you cant get me for spying on Trump without getting Susan Rice and Barack Obama’, who knew about it.
Does the January 20, 2017, Susan Rice memo look different now?
Again, no one saw the immediate issue. What Comey just described on that March day in 2017 was the total usurpation of the entire reason the Gang of Eight exists; to eliminate the potential for political weaponization of the Intelligence Community by the executive branch.
The Gang of Eight notifications to the majority and minority of the legislative branch are specifically designed to make sure what James Comey admitted to doing was never supposed to happen.
Team Obama carried out a political operation using outside contractors and the intelligence community, and the checks-and-balances in the system were intentionally usurped. This is an indisputable fact, and a point highlighted by John Durham’s court filing:
Worse still, the entire legislative branch of Congress, which specifically includes the Republicans that now controlled the House and Senate, did nothing. They just ignored what was admitted to them. The usurpation was willfully ignored.
The mechanism of the G08 was bypassed without a twitch of condemnation or investigation…. because the common enemy was Donald Trump.
This example highlights the collapse of the system. Obama, the executive branch, collapsed the system by usurping the process; in essence the process became the bigger issue, and the lack of immediate legislative branch reaction became evidence of open acceptance.
The outcomes of the usurpation played out over the next four years, Donald J. Trump was kneecapped and lost his presidency because of it. However, the bigger issue of the collapse still exists.
The downstream consequence of the Legislative Branch accepting the Executive Branch usurpation meant both intelligence committees were compromised. Additionally, the leadership of both the House and Senate were complicit. Think about this carefully. The Legislative Branch allowance of the intelligence usurpation meant the Legislative Branch was now subservient to the Intelligence Branch.
That’s where we are.
Right now.
That’s where we are.
Term-3 Obama is now back in the White House with Joe Biden.
Term-1 and Term-2 Obama usurped the ‘check and balance‘ within the system and weaponized the intelligence apparatus. During Trump’s term that weaponization was covered up by a compliant congress, and not a single member of the oversight called it out. Now, Term-3 Obama steps back in to continue the cover up and continue the weaponization.
Hopefully, you can now see the scale of the problem that surrounds us with specific citation for what has taken place. What I just explained to you above is not conspiracy theory, it is admitted fact that anyone can look upon. Yet….
Have you seen this mentioned anywhere?
Have you seen this called out by anyone in Congress?
Have you seen anyone in media (ally or adversary) call this out? Have you seen any member of the Judicial Branch stand up and say wait, what is taking place is not okay? Have you seen a single candidate for elected office point this out? Have you seen anyone advising a candidate to point this out?
This is our current status. It is not deniable. The truth exists regardless of our comfort.
Not a single person in power will say openly what has taken place. They are scared of the Fourth Branch. The evidence of what has taken place is right there in front of our face. The words, actions and activities of those who participated in this process are not deniable.
There are only two members of the Gang of Eight who have existed in place from January 2007 (the real beginning of Obama’s term, two years before he took office when the Congress flipped).
Only two members of the G08 have been consistently in place from January of 2007 to right now, today. All the others came and went, but two members of the Gang of Eight have been part of that failed and collapsed oversight throughout the past 15 years, Nancy Pelosi and Mitch McConnell.
♦ TECHNOLOGY – On a global scale – the modern intelligence gathering networks are now dependent on data collection to execute their intelligence missions. In the digital age nations have been executing various methods to gather that data. Digital surveillance has replaced other methods of interception. Those surveillance efforts have resulted in a coalescing of regional data networks based on historic multi-national relationships.
We have a recent frame of reference for the “U.S. data collection network” within the NSA. Through the allied process the Five Eyes nations all rely on the NSA surveillance database (U.K, Australia, Canada, New Zealand and U.S.) The NSA database provides the digital baseline for intelligence operations in defense of our allies. The portals into the NSA database are essentially an assembly of allies in like-minded ideological connection to the United States.
Unfortunately, there have been some revelations about the NSA database being used to monitor our allies, like in the example of Germany and surveillance on Angela Merkel’s phone. As long as “the good guys” are operating honorably, allies of the United States can feel confident about having protection from the NSA surveillance of global digital data. We warn our friends if we detect something dangerous etc.
The U.S. has nodes on communication pipelines to intercept and extract data. We have also launched hundreds, perhaps thousands, of satellites to conduct surveillance and gather up data. All of this data is fed into the NSA database where it is monitored (presumably) as a national security mechanism, and in defense of our allies.
However, what about data collection or data networks that are outside the NSA database? What do our enemies do? The NSA database is just one intelligence operation of digital surveillance amid the entire world, and we do not allow access by adversaries we are monitoring. So what do they do? What do our allies do who might not trust the United States due to past inconsistencies, ie. the Middle East?
The answers to those questions highlight other data collection networks. So a brief review of the major players is needed.
♦ CHINA – China operates their own database. They, like the NSA, scoop up data for their system. Like us, China launches satellites and deploys other electronic data collection methods to download into their database. This is why the issues of electronic devices manufactured in China becomes problematic. Part of the Chinese data collection system involves the use of spyware, hacking and extraction.
Issues with Chinese communication company Huawei take on an added dimension when you consider the goal of the Chinese government to conduct surveillance and assemble a network of data to compete with the United States via the NSA. Other Chinese methods of surveillance and data-collection are less subversive, as in the examples of TicTok and WeChat. These are Chinese social media companies that are scraping data just like the NSA scrapes data from Facebook, Twitter and other Silicon Valley tech companies. [ Remember, the Intelligence Branch is a public-private partnership. ]
♦ RUSSIA – It is very likely that Russia operates their own database. We know Russia launches satellites, just like China and the USA, for the same purposes. Russia is also very proficient at hacking into other databases and extracting information to store and utilize in their own network. The difference between the U.S., China and Russia is likely that Russia spends more time on the hacking aspect because they do not generate actual technology systems as rapidly as the U.S. and China.
The most recent database creation is an outcome of an ally having to take action because they cannot rely on the ideology of the United States remaining consistent, as the administrations ping-pong based on ideology.
♦ SAUDI ARABIA – Yes, in 2016 we discovered that Saudi Arabia was now operating their own intelligence data-gathering operation. It would make sense, given the nature of the Middle East and the constant fluctuations in political support from the United States. It is a lesson the allied Arab community and Gulf Cooperation Council learned quickly when President Obama went to Cairo in 2009 and launched the Islamist Spring (Arab Spring) upon them.
I have no doubt the creation of the Saudi intelligence network was specifically because the Obama administration started supporting radical Islamists within the Muslim Brotherhood and threw fuel on the fires of extremism all over the Arab world.
Think about it., What would you do if you were Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Bahrain, Kuwait, the UAE, Jordan, Oman or Yemen and you knew the United States could just trigger an internal uprising of al-Qaeda, ISIS and the political arm of the Muslim Brotherhood to seek your destruction?
Without a doubt, those urgent lessons from 2009, 2010, 2011 triggered the formation of the Arab Intelligence Network as a network to defend itself with consistency. They assembled the network and activated it in 2017 as pictured above.
♦ Israel – Along a similar outlook to the Arab network, no doubt Israel operates an independent data collection system as a method of protecting itself from ever-changing U.S. politics amid a region that is extremely hostile to its very existence. Like the others, Israel launches proprietary satellites, and we can be sure they use covert methods to gather electronic data just like the U.S. and China.
As we have recently seen in the Pegasus story, Israel creates spyware programs that are able to track and monitor cell phone communications of targets. The spyware would not work unless Israel had access to some network where the phone meta-data was actually stored. So yeah, it makes sense for Israel to operate an independent intelligence database.
♦ Summary: As we understand the United States Intelligence Branch of government as the superseding entity that controls the internal politics of our nation, we also must consider that multiple nations have the same issue. There are major intelligence networks around the world beside the NSA “Five-Eyes” database. China, Russia, Saudi Arabia and Israel all operate proprietary databases deploying the same tools and techniques for assembly.
The geopolitical conflict that has always existed has now shifted into a digital battlespace. The Intelligence Agencies from these regions are now operating as the backbone of the government that uses them and has become dependent on them. [<- Reread that].
Once you accept the digital-era intelligence apparatus of China, Russia, Saudi-Arabia, The United States and Israel, are now the primary national security mechanisms for stabilization of government; then you accept the importance of those intelligence operations.
Once you understand how foundational those modern intelligence operations have become for the stability and continuity of those governments…… then you begin to understand just how the United States intelligence community became more important than the government that created it.
♦ Public Private Partnership – The modern Fourth Branch of Government is only possible because of a Public-Private partnership with the intelligence apparatus. You do not have to take my word for it, the partnership is so brazened they have made public admissions.
The biggest names in Big Tech announced in June their partnership with the Five Eyes intelligence network, ultimately controlled by the NSA, to: (1) monitor all activity in their platforms; (2) identify extremist content; (3) look for expressions of Domestic Violent Extremism (DVE); and then, (4) put the content details into a database where the Five Eyes intelligence agencies (U.K., U.S., Australia, Canada, New Zealand) can access it.
Facebook, Twitter, Google and Microsoft are all partnering with the intelligence apparatus. It might be difficult to fathom how openly they admit this, but they do. Look at this sentence in the press release (emphasis mine):
[…] “The Group will use lists from intelligence-sharing group Five Eyes adding URLs and PDFs from more groups, including the Proud Boys, the Three Percenters and neo-Nazis.”
Think about that sentence structure very carefully. They are “adding to” the preexisting list…. admitting the group (aka Big Tech) already have access to the the intelligence-sharing database… and also admitting there is a preexisting list created by the Five Eyes consortium.
Obviously, who and what is defined as “extremist content” will be determined by the Big Tech insiders themselves. This provides a gateway, another plausible deniability aspect, to cover the Intelligence Branch from any oversight.
When the Intelligence Branch within government wants to conduct surveillance and monitor American citizens, they run up against problems due to the Constitution of the United States. They get around those legal limitations by sub-contracting the intelligence gathering, the actual data mining, and allowing outside parties (contractors) to have access to the central database.
The government cannot conduct electronic searches (4th amendment issue) without a warrant; however, private individuals can search and report back as long as they have access. What is being admitted is exactly that preexisting partnership. The difference is that Big Tech will flag the content from within their platforms, and now a secondary database filled with the extracted information will be provided openly for the Intelligence Branch to exploit.
The volume of metadata captured by the NSA has always been a problem because of the filters needed to make the targeting useful. There is a lot of noise in collecting all data that makes the parts you really want to identify more difficult to capture. This new admission puts a new massive filtration system in the metadata that circumvents any privacy protections for individuals.
Previously, the Intelligence Branch worked around the constitutional and unlawful search issue by using resources that were not in the United States. A domestic U.S. agency, working on behalf of the U.S. government, cannot listen on your calls without a warrant. However, if the U.S. agency sub-contracts to say a Canadian group, or foreign ally, the privacy invasion is no longer legally restricted by U.S. law.
What was announced in June 2021 is an alarming admission of a prior relationship along with open intent to define their domestic political opposition as extremists.
July 26 (Reuters) – A counterterrorism organization formed by some of the biggest U.S. tech companies including Facebook (FB.O) and Microsoft (MSFT.O) is significantly expanding the types of extremist content shared between firms in a key database, aiming to crack down on material from white supremacists and far-right militias, the group told Reuters.
Until now, the Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism’s (GIFCT) database has focused on videos and images from terrorist groups on a United Nations list and so has largely consisted of content from Islamist extremist organizations such as Islamic State, al Qaeda and the Taliban.
Over the next few months, the group will add attacker manifestos – often shared by sympathizers after white supremacist violence – and other publications and links flagged by U.N. initiative Tech Against Terrorism. It will use lists from intelligence-sharing group Five Eyes, adding URLs and PDFs from more groups, including the Proud Boys, the Three Percenters and neo-Nazis.
The firms, which include Twitter (TWTR.N) and Alphabet Inc’s (GOOGL.O) YouTube, share “hashes,” unique numerical representations of original pieces of content that have been removed from their services. Other platforms use these to identify the same content on their own sites in order to review or remove it. (read more)
The influence of the Intelligence Branch now reaches into our lives, our personal lives. In the decades before 9/11/01 the intelligence apparatus intersected with government, influenced government, and undoubtedly controlled many institutions with it. The legislative oversight function was weak and growing weaker, but it still existed and could have been used to keep the IC in check. However, after the events of 9/11/01, the short-sighted legislative reactions opened the door to allow the surveillance state to weaponize.
After the Patriot Act was triggered, not coincidentally only six weeks after 9/11, a slow and dangerous fuse was lit that ends with the intelligence apparatus being granted a massive amount of power. The problem with assembled power is always what happens when a Machiavellian network takes control over that power and begins the process to weaponize the tools for their own malicious benefit. That is exactly what the installation of Barack Obama was all about.
The Obama network took pre-assembled intelligence weapons we should never have allowed to be created and turned those weapons into tools for his radical and fundamental change. The target was the essential fabric of our nation. Ultimately, this corrupt political process gave power to create the Fourth Branch of Government, the Intelligence Branch. From that perspective the fundamental change was successful.
Last point, they all knew. Every person in the DC system, regardless of where they are located in their containment silos, knew what had taken place. They all knew. No one in DC did not know. This is the very reason why both parties desperately needed to get Andrew Weissmann and Robert Mueller installed.
The 2017 special counsel, under the guise of a Trump-Russia investigation, WAS THE COVER UP plan. The intent of the special counsel was to protect all the inside and outside agents across all branches who has been working together against Trump throughout his candidacy and into his presidency. Not a single elected DC politician did not know this was the intent.
♦ WHAT NOW? There is a way to stop and deconstruct the Intelligence Branch, but it requires some outside-the-box thinking and reliance on the Constitution as a tool to radically change one element within government. In the interim, we must remain focused on the three tiers that we need for success.
• Tier One is “tactical civics” at a local level. Engaged and active citizen participation at the community, city, town and hamlet level of society. This is what might be described as grassroots level, school board level; city council level; county commissioner level.
• Tier Two is “extreme federalism” at a state level. Engaged and active citizen participation through your State House and State Senate representative. This is state level assembly and action demands upon the State House, State Senate and State Governor.
• Tier Three the challenge of “federal offices” on a national level. This is where CTH outlines a singular action that can be taken upstream that allows the first two tiers to retake control over federal offices. This is where we throw the One Ring into the fire of Mordor. {Go Deep}
I am confident that ultimately “We The People” will win. How we can execute the “One Ring” solution is more challenging; in the interim, tactical civics and extreme federalism are doable right now, in this next 2022 election cycle.
Fox panel discussion with the host introduction
“You would think a disclosure this big (Hillary Campaign created Trump-Russia link) would merit discussion on all the Sunday news shows …
“… but not ONE has covered it”
this is all well and good but Durham could literally not be heard from again and virtually everyone in power would be fine with it
a pub led congress wont do anything anyway and they certainly couldnt get the doj to do anything
there doesnt need to be an “ongoing investigation” to stop a real investigation because there wont be a real investigation
something else is going on
Probably sidelining Killery from running again. No one wants her.
I’ve heard she’s auditioning for a part in the Wizard of Oz as the wicked witch of the east. The lady that’s there now is shorter.
I have real doubts Durham even exists…..where is the proof, in this world of constant videography?
Thank you for the huge undertaking to do the research and connect the dots. This updated civics history should be taught in high school as a graduation requirement.
There are many more eye programs then 5 eyes.
Every time these people are shown and what they have done to this country and the world it makes me literally sick.
Muslim # 1 and # 2 are responsible for many deaths including Americans and they should pay the ultimate price for every crime they have committed.
Oh, you ain’t seen nothing yet! You may be literally sick when you learn the rest of it. Buckle up!
Yeah, how many Jewish entities are nehind this entire takeover of our government? Until we get the head of the snake/s cut off we will continue to be playing defense!
IMO, yesterday’s Durham news was all about looking away from the Canadian trucker protest news.
Just that simple.
I thought Biden’s War was all about distracting from multiple problems on the homefront?
Biden’s War will be about world instability followed with martial law world wide.
That’s part of it, but these folk rarely do something for just one reason. There will be others.
Not a distraction. I’m perfectly capable of multitasking and joining the dots 🤷♀️
Few try to take the time; connect dots, fewer.
Durham is only in place
To keep a leash on Swine Hilda
So, based on this article by Sundance on the 4th Branch, am I generally right in my track of thinking regarding Maria Bartiromo’s talk this morning on Fox News? That is, she knows the rabbit hole of corruption goes way deeper than the Clinton camp–that it ultimately involves the 4th Branch, but she dares not go there lest she lose her job? Am I right to speculate that she wouldn’t even report on Hilary here unless the 4th Branch gave her permission and wanted her to do so–that this is the Obama camp, in cahoots with the 4th Branch, taking out the Clinton Camp? Again, based on this article, that the 4th Branch has dirt on everyone, yes, every citizen, and so has blackmailing power to control all the Mainstream Media and all the politicians, that this reporting by Maria which severely damages the Clinton camp, wouldn’t be happening unless the Obama camp/4th Branch wanted it to happen?
Am I crazy for thinking this way? (I hope that I am actually)
I would say your thinking is quite sane. Sorry.
Bingo
Hillary was simply using the resources that Obama and Holder had opened up, Bartiromo stopped well short of boiling it down further as you observed. It’s not crazy when clear observation (Thank You CTH) proves these people will eat their own in their quest for power.
There are other reasons this may have been the case other than the one mentioned above. We will know when it is time for us to know. People will find what they need to find when they are ready.
Remember – Bartiromo has gone through the WEF Young Leader training…
TROLL! NO JUSTICE WILL BE HANDED OUT except what the people hand out on their own.
How come comments, opinions or observations which one doesn’t agree with automatically mean a person is a troll?
Seems we are at a crossroads where many people are just now starting to even get near the concept of asking the right questions, much less, grasping the depth of the games at play, so would it not be counterproductive to prematurely label people who post as troll, maybe sending a person away who might otherwise be on the verge if seeing things previously unseen?
Thank you. Well said. If your here reading and commenting that is a fundamental right that ALL Americans should embrace and fight for. Let’s face it, Fighting eachother only further enslaves our country. We do not have to agree inorder to have truth enlighten us about underlying issues that affect us all.
And thank you too. Intolerance is how they divide us. Wake up people. We are strong when we are one. I didn’t read that as a troll comment personally. Trolls usually hurl abuse and say nothing with any substance to it. I like to look at the other side of the argument usually anyway, especially when only one side of everything is rammed down our throats. I like to understand the point of view of others.
I’ve seen Maria Bartaromo’s show as one of the rare ones on mainstream tv that has stayed on this story from the beginning. Whether as an outlet to let off steam for those aware of the shenanigans or a truly fantastic reporter being careful to work within the framework her bosses will allow – who knows?
After all Lou Dobbs, and Trish Regan were canned for ‘going there’ so think her show is trying to stay inside the lines.
Hers is about the only news show in the cable lineup worth watching these days.
Let’s see what Lou Dobbs says Monday on his podcast
Lou was talking about Hammer and Scorecard
https://theamericanreport.org/2022/02/13/hammering-out-their-cover-story-two-days-before-trump-inauguration-obamas-ag-lynch-cia-boss-brennan-executive-order-12333/
I always think of the high school days, ‘don’t do that or it will end up in your permanent file!’ – why wouldn’t these agencies be compiling as much info on everyone that can? Part of the Patriot Act free reign these agencies were given way be when. Gathering up as much info as possible must be like free candy for the taking by these agencies.
True, and not just near the southern border. Come wander the Appalachian Highlands. Meet some interesting people. Learn some new old skills. Memorize a few frequencies.
For the coming social credit system – which, fortunately won’t be coming, because we won’t let it.
You may be right that they do not collect information on every citizen. But, to be fair, I must ask, how do you know this to be the case that they do not? Is that a speculation of yours, or a confirmed fact?
well, having been a witness in several cases, know for a fact that there wasn’t any aspect in my life that had not already been known before they accepted the documentation I presented to them – not wanting any surprises and such; plus, live long enough one sees things.
Oh, ok. Now I understand you better as to what you are saying–as to whom the “not everyone” is. Still, that’s a small fraction, though their getting off grid is perhaps something all the rest of us should consider, at least to things like cellphone companies, ip address, etc
A good place to start is with a de-googled smart phone (if you must have a smart phone).
Maria is no fool. She will do what she must to stay in the trenches. I remember her body language & reactions when Trump roasted Hillary…
Isn’t Maria one of the WEF Young Global Leaders? That would explain it all.
When I see the graphic of the 2021 Gang of eight, I feel you are letting my Senator (Langford-OK) off the hook. He was replaced by Rubio, but was on the Gang of Eight during the Trump years when the SSCI was running the coup against Trump.
There are very very few good guys in DC, even those who claim to be Sunday school teachers…..
Oh, he’s definitely in the game, he and Cole. I’d love to see him primaried…
Langford was on the Senate Intelligence Committee, but he was not in the Gang of Eight.
Marco Rubio replaced Richard Burr as Chairman, now Vice-Chair.
Langford was never in SSCI leadership.
Sorry, but you are mistaken.
…especially those who claim to be Sunday school teachers. There is no better example of hypocrisy, deception and corruption than James Langford.
It would be interesting to know percentage of those who “claim to be Sunday School teachers” do so for virtue signaling reasons only . . .
Every time I read this I get sick, but I also see something new I missed before.
I’ve never credited the theory that 9/11 was orchestrated by our own government. Now, having read this again, I have several questions.
How was it the Patriot Act was so quickly written and passed? Almost as if was was prepared in advance. Why was 0bama, veritably unknown and untested, selected to be installed and by whom? And why allow social media companies to be involved in the IC data mining?
Call me slow, because most of you long time treepers probably realized this quite a while ago. But it seems 9/11 was the perfect crisis (and excuse) to start the ball rolling on finally gaining ultimate control over the citizens. So, is it possible some A B C agency was involved?
That’s where I’m at. Every additional IC move since 9/11 has flowed into the next and furthered the agenda of control, till this is where we are.
I swallowed that very same bitter red pill a short time ago myself.
Yes, choked on that same pill myself.
Needlessly complex, Mims
Fuslim terrorists are crazy as sh#t
Crazy enough to take flight classes and learn to fly but not land
And crazy enough to fly jetliners into skyscrapers
… the end
(score one for them, they really caught us flat-footed)
As far as “how fast the Patriot Act was written”, I’m sure many agencies / actors have plans and position papers written and stored in drawers (or computers these days) that can be dusted off and gussied up overnight
See Sundance’s past writings about who actually writes legislation these days
I don’t disagree with your assertion regarding the religion of pieces, nor can I prove my belief that 9/11 was a cooperative venture, but given what I know now about the Clintons, the Bushes and the IC, it would not at all surprise me if “i$lam, it’s all the rage“ had been commandeered into the attacks by creative agreements between CIA/FBI and some fortune seekers from the ME. Suicide bombers are generally poor misguided boys/men working for manipulative men seeking money and influence. Guys like Bin Laden never fly the planes. Too much to lose, too much to gain.
Not saying it wasn’t done by the religious zealots, just thinking they could have had some help, and not even be aware of it
And yes, bills written in advance waiting for the right opportunity
Agree completely.
Nope, sorry. Even a cursory look at the evidence, as well as “Who benefits” reveals the truth, no matter how hard the 4th branch works to scrub it. Not all Americans are total idiots.
They are called “Futures Studies”. I am sure you can find the list of “OP” numbers for the groups involved in the various agencies. They are known to contractors and are unclassified.
Great observation
Thx SR
GOOD GRIEF, MIMS! YES, the govt was directly involved in 911. Time and space doesn’t permit me to list all the links that prove so, but please start with the excellent website Architects and Engineers for 911 truth.
https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/videos/category/0
Jet fuel doesn’t get hot enough to melt steel. But thermite and nano-thermite (explosives used to cut steel beams with precision) does. Watch the molten steel pouring out of the tower. Molten steel was found underground two weeks after the collapse. Only nano-thermite can burn without air, under ground, for two weeks.
Watch the HORIZONTAL PUFFS OF SMOKE that precede the collapse of upper floors. Those are the cutter charges, cutting steel support columns:
Lol I told you I was slow. Thx Merc!
00:33 – 00:38 shows cutter charges going off down corner of building. The charges eject horizontal puffs of smoke to the right and left side of the corner of the building. These charges precede the collapsing of the building.
The collapsing building throws a lot of dust but the collapsing building always follows the cutter charges. This shows the charges are allowing the building to collapse.
The more you watch those 7 seconds of footage, the more obvious the cutter charges are, and the more obvious it becomes that the charges are what’s causing the building to collapse.
At 00:36-00:38 note huge sections of the building being discharged horizontally hundreds of feet, trailing huge dust clouds. That’s from major explosions; deliberate explosions, planned explosions.
THIS WAS A U.S. GOVERMENT ATTACK AGAINST ITS’ OWN PEOPLE.
Support columns cut with thermite charges
http://voluntarysociety.org/conditioning/conspiracy/911/wtcdemolition/shapedcharges/images/thermiteonwtccolumns.jpg
http://voluntarysociety.org/conditioning/conspiracy/911/wtcdemolition/shapedcharges/images/wtc_anglecut.jpg
Frame by frame analysis of cutter charges collapsing Tower 1
Sorry, the thermite charge fantasy and deliberately blowing up the WTC theory is pure crap. Nothing personal, but I don’t let logically impossible scenarios pass without calling them out.
Former FBI chief, Los Angeles, Ted Gunderson: 911 was an inside job.
See how the jet fuel cut through the support girder at a 45 degree angle? Jet fuel burns no hotter than 700 degrees. Structural steel melts at 1,600 degrees. Melted steel is visible on this cut. 911 was an inside job. The only thing not logical is your refusal to examine the evidence. That makes you eligible to be on SCOTUS.
http://voluntarysociety.org/conditioning/conspiracy/911/wtcdemolition/shapedcharges/images/thermiteonwtccolumns.jpg
Former FBI Chief, Los Angeles, Ted Gunderson says 911 was an inside job.
Calling my posts “crap” is personal. Go shove your crap elsewhere, jerkoff.
Exactly!
Ty!
It was all a false flag attack by our own gov’t, assisted by the Israelis. The complete stand down of the DOD after news of hijackings hit. The Pentagon hit destroyed financial records of missing money, the hole was clearly a missile hole. They hurriedly shipped the Twin Towers steel out of the country before testing for thermite could be done, but footage exists of the girders sticking out of the rubble, sliced on the diagonal, as is done with shape charges by implosion engineers to facilitate the building sliding straight down into it’s own footprint. The implosion of Building 7, which was never hit, thermite evidence of molten metal dripping out windows. First responder witnesses reporting explosions on lower levels. Mass formation psychosis has been going on a long time, along with censorship of dissenters. Note the rabid, disproportionate hate spewed onto Sandy Hook “deniers”. The shakier the narrative, the more venomous the response to questioning it.
I was thinking the same exact thing after reading this article. We are living in the most cynical days in history.
Yes, well aware of Granddaddy Bush and his C I A. It probably started even further back, in 1940 with the OSS
Worst kept secret that the OSS was absolutely infested with Soviet agents. Ditto for Fabien Socialists.
Samuel Prescott Bush, father of U.S. Senator Prescott Bush, the paternal grandfather of former U.S. President George H. W. Bush, and patrilineal great-grandfather of former Texas Governor and President George W. Bush and former Florida Governor Jeb Bush.
Bush served on the board of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, In 1931, he was appointed to Herbert Hoover‘s President’s Committee for Unemployment Relief
George H.W. Bush once said, “If the American People ever find out what we have done, they will chase us down the street and lynch us.”
I wish that I had known more about the Bush family before I supported 41 and 43 . . .
Paragraph 5 is what made my eyes widen.
Reading the rest of the Special Counsel’s 2/11/2022 motion in USA v. Sussmann, they cite to precedent in US v. John Gotti for the proposition that Sussmann’s current lawyers from the Latham Watkins law firm may be disqualified from representing Sussmann in this case because those Latham Watkins attorneys may have been witnesses to criminal activity. Sundance has linked in this post the 2/23/2018 letter to the Senate Intelligence Committee from Latham Watkins attorney Kathryn Rummler on behalf of then-Ambassador Susan Rice, that describes the January 20, 2017 email Rice wrote to herself explaining the Obama-Biden-Comey-Strock meeting on 1/5/2017. The statements in the 2/23/2018 letter from Attorney Rummler are within the five year statute of limitations for false statements that may be in violation of US Code.
This almost never happens because these 2 law firms and attorneys are getting zapped too
Don’t forget that by January 2017 just as President Trump became President the FBI and DOJ concluded that the Russian Collusion Dossier was a hoax because the guy who wrote it TOLD THEM SO! Yet in spite of that they cranked up an investigation with a Special Counsel and 17 Angry Democrats from Brooklyn to frame the President of the United States for a crime that never even happened!
And, the CoVid Pandemic brought to America by the same CRIMINALS?
Print out this article and make a bunch of copies; slip them into the newspapers at newsstands at local popular coffee shops, put them under windshield wipers at local schools and businesses.
nice
grassroots-level monkeywrenching
Saved it to do just that; have to get more ink for the printer; but yes! leave copies where people will read and get educated. Throwing as much sand in the works the old fashioned way.
Very informative words.
It sounds to me like TPTB is throwing Clinton to the wolves in order to protect puppet Obama , Holder and their handlers.
Hillary has enough dirt on enough people that she COULD take a bunch of them with her on her way down, but in doing so, she would be forever giving up on her dreams of being the first female POTUS…and she may want to keep her grandchildren alive, too, which has probably been mentioned to her.
She folded to Team Obama in 2008 and I don’t think she will push back too hard this time either – she will cut a deal, throw some low hanging fruit to the investigators and the press, and will sail off with a slap on the wrist and a promise to never challenge her “betters” again, IMHO!
Yes.
… And with a few more million $$ in small denomination bills.
Distracted in 2007-2008 from the economic collapse?
I totally disagree, we remember all this, the powers that be refuse to do anything!
We just had confirmation Hildabeast was spying on a sitting president using government sources. The biggest scandal to ever hit our country and we’re not even indicting The people involved. There’s a serious lack of Will in this country to hold people on the left accountable!!!!!!!
Shortly after James Baker was interviewed by House investigators in Oct 2018, Perkins Coie’s managing partner felt it necessary to issue a statement that Rodney Joffe had “no connections” to the Clinton campaign.
https://archive.fo/dXl5j
Read of Bob Bauer here and his communist father and Rodney Joffe:
HAMMERING Out Their Cover Story Two Days Before Trump Inauguration: Obama’s AG Lynch, CIA Boss Brennan Suddenly ‘Updated’ CIA’s 1981 Executive Order 12333 Domestic Bulk Surveillance Guidelines; DURHAM: Clinton Campaign Paid ‘Tech Exec-1’ To Hack Trump Tower, White House
https://theamericanreport.org/2022/02/13/hammering-out-their-cover-story-two-days-before-trump-inauguration-obamas-ag-lynch-cia-boss-brennan-executive-order-12333/
I hate to be dopey, but it strained me to read all this and comprehend it all. And I’m a pretty smart guy. We really need a more easily digestible and TLDR version of this if we hope to win over any Normies. Everyone who would read this article would by definition be somebody who is already unequivocal committed to Our Side.
We live in an ADHD society (which greatly aided their cause)
Think this article grows with each new piece of verified information comes out; each time reading it with new nuggets of insight build a firmer understanding of the depth of this thing; one of the best sources of facts on the internet all in one article with links one can do their own verification with.
Like a piece of art, it’s worth taking the time to ingest the intricacies we are being gifted.
It Trump wins back office or is installed before 2024, is he aware and motivated enough about this to take immediate drastic action?
And could he just declare these agencies dissolved on day one and tell them to clean out their desks, collect their severance checks, and go home?
President Trump will have to start firing FBI, DOJ, CIA, FDA, CDC and NIH officials by the hundreds! I hope he has the guts and the smarts to do this otherwise he’s just asking for a Russian Collusion and Pandemic Hoax 2.0!
Not the expert, but no. However, he can decapitate the agencies by demanding the resignation of top leadership. He can direct an immediate reduction (25%?) of all personnel. He can withhold their budget and/or reduce it significantly. He can turnover personnel. Those in DC assigned to the hinterlands and the flyover folks brought in to DC. I think he can also have his folks take the reigns. If the Senate doesn’t approve, the certainly one MAGA senator will all for recess appointments. If not, find the right GS-12 and make him the temporary head. PDJT has to be way out of the box about this.
Joffe owns Neustar. didn’t even wait for FISA warrant to start grabbing traffic. He grabbed traffic and then used it to help them get their warrant.
Meet the shadowy tech brokers that deliver your data to the NSA
These so-called “trusted third-parties” may be the most important tech companies you’ve never heard of. ZDNet reveals how these companies work as middlemen or “brokers” of customer data between ISPs and phone companies, and the U.S. government.
Cbeyond can receive as many as five to ten subpoenas per week. These data requests are regularly forwarded to Neustar, which acts as the ISP’s “custodian of records.” They are validated, and — more often than not — data is handed over to the requesting law enforcement agency.
But on the rare occasion Cbeyond receives a top-secret FISA warrant — two per year on average, according to a senior staffer, who has direct knowledge of the matter, Neustar pulls the data from the ISPs networks and hands it to the requesting government agency.
These warrants can allow the FBI or the NSA to collect an unknown but potentially limitless amount of data on millions of Americans and foreigners.
https://www.zdnet.com/article/meet-the-shadowy-tech-brokers-that-deliver-your-data-to-the-nsa/
Neustar’s Rodney Joffe Named to Federal Communications Commission’s Communications, Security, Reliability and Interoperability Council
https://www.home.neustar/about-us/news-room/press-releases/2015/rodney-joffe-fcc
Notice everything is “third party”. What do government employees do?
Supervise, maybe.
Nothing. But spy. Collect data and lie.
“Obama was installed”.
Thank you.
Another mysterious “third party” hired by the pentagon
The Big Pentagon Internet Mystery Now Partially Solved
After weeks of wonder by the networking community, the Pentagon has now provided a very terse explanation for why it hired a shadowy company residing at a shared workspace above a Florida bank to manage a colossal, previously idle chunk of the internet that it owns.
After weeks of wonder by the networking community, the Pentagon has now provided a very terse explanation for what it’s doing. But it has not answered many basic questions, beginning with why it chose to entrust management of the address space to a company that seems not to have existed until September.
https://www.usnews.com/news/business/articles/2021-04-24/the-big-pentagon-internet-mystery-now-partially-solved?src=usn_tw
Sure wish Sundance posted about the worldwide trucker convoy protests. The message board for those posts are very meaningful and motivational to the broader populace. He should be posting at least once or twice per day on the truckers.
Bless your heart, Freakonomics … Had you not included the “He should” sentence in your comment, I would have held back my reply of “You should build your own website so you can post as much and as often as you wish.”
THEY SPIED ON A SITTING PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES…………..
What do you think China would do if a supposed countryman of China spied on President XI?
My brain hurts after reading all the above. Guess I’ll re-read Psalm 2 to encourage myself.
Why do the nations rage, the people plot a vain thing?
Great article….thanks
They spent 7 years trying to convince the public that Trump was like Putin
When all along it was Obama who was JUST LIKE Stalin
Read this preserved article “they” did not want you to read:
I Should Know: Dems’ Intel Abuse Is Reminiscent of My Work for Ceausescu – The American Report
https://theamericanreport.org/2021/06/03/i-should-know-dems-intel-abuse-is-reminiscent-of-my-work-for-ceausescu/
There was a “Deep State motive to control Julian Assange.” This was to prevent Assange from revealing the source of the DNC Wikileaks. But Assange stated that he never reveals sources to Wikileaks. He did say Russia was not a source, however, and there is no need to say it again.
Could it be that nothing more can be gained from Assange regarding the DNC information?
Would a Trump pardon entice Assange to reveal the source? I doubt it, because Assange seems determined to protect Wikileaks sources no matter what happens to him.
Will we ever get any further information from Assange? It seems doubtful to me.
Sundance,
I’m wondering if you have thought about a thread maybe called…….
Who should PT sue?
Specifically, I’d be curious if you think he can and will. And if yes who do you see him suing?
And finally do you think if he sues, can much come from it?
Would such a lawsuit distract Trump from his goals for America?
The deep state is so deep and so pervasive. We knew most of this for months. I spent a good chunk of this day reading all the notes. How do we stop them? How do we correct this??? How do we get our country back????? Is this 1775 allover again? I’m ready! How do we divide our time; working to make a living and defending our country. I am not sure my Senators are pro USA or themselves.
If you don’t know “How” then follow and support who does.
The last time Trump did a singularly independent executive act…was when he fired Comey…After that the wolves closed in. The biggest mistake Trump made was not freeing Asange. If he had there would have been dirt on the traitors that would have over ridden what they had on him….. and Trump never would have been blackmailed to push the death shots…I will never ever forgive that trespass against the people.
What are the chances HRC was spying on Obama too.
There is no way that with all the laws the Clinton’s were breaking they didn’t have people checking on what Obama and his circle knew.
Generally that is how extortion works.
Just my opionion that this is bigger than the spying on just Trump.
If it was the investigation would already have ended.
The Bushes and Clintons used people inside their circles to get a stranglehold on DC and its agencies.
They were not going to sit back and watch some young hotshot bring in his circle of associates without making sure they had enough dirt on him that he wouldn’t turn on them
I have wondered if. Pres Trump really is the right man to run again or do we need a DeSantis type? But after reader this huge explanation of how the 4th Branch works (thank you immensely Sundace). I am convinced that there is no other man possibly capable to weed through all of this cya stuff than Our Pres Don. Through slugging it out for years he totaling knows where the bodies are buried and is smart enough to navigate around their double speak. That said, it will be a very hard campaign for he now knows who to detract their plan Or circumnavigate around them.
HE KNOWS HOW IT WORKS THIS TIME
circumnavigate a run them.
Bottom Line:
Obama was an unconstitutional POtuS, because he is an undocumented alien, a CIA-backed foreign spy, and currently pulling Xiden’s strings.
Kamalalala Harris is an unconstitutional vPOtuS, because she does not meet the natural born Citizenship specification of having both parents being US citizens when she was born on US soil.
Xiden is a fraud POtuS because he usurped the Executive Office through criminal fraud election.
The current full US Federal Government is entrenched in treason.
Calamity Jones, ah yes!
I Should Know: Dems’ Intel Abuse Is Reminiscent of My Work for Ceausescu – The American Report
https://theamericanreport.org/2021/06/03/i-should-know-dems-intel-abuse-is-reminiscent-of-my-work-for-ceausescu/
Chief Brody upon seeing the shark at the stern: we’re going to need a bigger boat.
Sundance does a fantastic job posting these deep dives.
But I cannot stomach to read them anymore.
It only reinforces my angst that our constitutional republic is gone, likely forever.
State rights. Get rid of ERIC system and anything or anyone with Soros, Gates,or big Tech, China, funding them. We need to learn how to use affidavits and notices to remind elected officials of oaths and hold accountable. Mal administration. If AG’s are unwilling to procecute, then we the ppl must take the Grand Juries back. This is why they took civics and the Constitution from schools. United, we the people hold ALL political power in this country. Fortunately, Barry was right… They jumped to soon. We can do this. No fear. Look how they use it to control and take more liberties. It is our children they are after. Literally. Go learn get active. Now. Affidavitmommas.com and theamericanstates assembly.net good places to learn. Hillsdale college has great ref material as well.
I am surprised by all the doom and gloom coming from the comments. This article is revolutionary in that he literally not only lays it out how the system became corrupted, with specific details, he tells us the solution. State elections. Now, we see why the election had to be allowed to be stolen. The only way to engage the American people to rise up and take back their local elections was to allow the steal to happen and slowly deconstruct it publicly so we could see it. For me, it was shocking to realize that these elections could not be stolen without the help of my local neighbors down the road. That’s the truth of it. We, the people are rising up to remove these corrupted officials who protect this insidious intelligence system put into place by our enemies.
I read this same article months ago.
That is some extensive reading much less understanding it all. But, there is always a bottom line….who, when and how will Obama, Holder, Clintons, and those obscure behind the scenes criminals going to be HELD ACCOUNTABLE? That is the only real and most important question. Every single one of them should be tried and sent to prison. If they are not held accountable, what and how is all the wasted research going to do America any good? Yes, the People of this country will stand up. But, how…when and why must they go through getting arrested, put in a cell to rot (as the Jan. 6 truly innocent and placid compared to Obama, Holder, Clintons and many other have done to this country). Only when I hear every single one of them will be prosecuted and put in prison will I and the rest of this country begin to heal.
Does a tree falling in the forest make a sound if no one is there to hear it?
Maybe Obama grandparents died before they saw their grandson became POTUS because they would have died of broken hearts seeing their grandson would become the most corrupted POTUS in the history of the US and purposely destroyed the country that they loved and grew up with. Something to think about Obama.
Everyone of these Intelligence offices is under POTUS. One option is to have POTUS to choose every important position (not just the HEAD) and to put term limits on them and made each chosen candidate to be automatically disqualified when there are certain numbers of conflict of interest (like more than 4 or 5) or connections to previous administration (if they get find out during serving their term; automatically removal—like someone lied on their resume and superior can fired them once the truth reveals. These need to put into laws. When Republicans take over the House and Senate, they need to write laws that the SSCI CANNOT and WILL NOT have any input in any POTUS chosen candidate. They are legislators what the hell do they know about running intelligence offices. Instead, those candidate would go straight to the Senate floor to being q&a and getting a vote. Perhaps the criteria should be that the current chosen candidate (not just the HEAD) to serve the term SHOULD NOT HAVE any affiliation to the prior administration due to conflict of interest so new perspectives (limit/prevent corruptions) can bring into the office/department [analogy is like prohibited marrying to siblings to prevent birth defects] . Damn it, NO ONE should be above POTUS. Total BS that Comey can’t share due to sensitivity of the issue. Damn it, if you don’t share those info then how the hell do you know if any of those info would connect to certain crises happen to the country and how the hell can our POTUS know how to response (G08 is BS). You think your department is smarter than POTUS(the 1 didn’t cheat to get to the Oval Office)?
Consider affiliation to the CCP too
This process is different with all the current appointments and to prevent corruptions at multi levels: POTUS would have the final signed off if he agreed with the Senate. It’s like a new bill. If POTUS is not concur with the Senate chosen candidate then that person can’t work in those intelligence agencies either. It had to be double agreements to insure the chosen candidate is working WITH POTUS and not like right now. Seem lengthy but it’s a way to prevent corruptions. Meanwhile the process undergoes and POTUS would have an interim to work on it. Plus, there should be deadline for those lazy Senators to work.
Many of the processes above are currently in practice. Should the rules be:
1. Promote from within the same agency can only serve 1 term. Regardless
2. If already served just 1 term in 1 agency then cannot serve any additional (not even 1) an appointed position in any another agency within the intelligence umbrella
Important: these aren’t just people in Charge of the agency but it’s inferiors also in charge. All after number of years, must be discharged like the Army. When they stay too long in government position, no longer effective.
Like Mark Twain said something like Change them often like baby’s diapers and for the same reason
Wow – and I’ve only read and watched part of this SO FAR. This is clearly part of what they meant – with the 16 year plan – when they said Obama was the first 8 years, laying the groundwork! This is another aspect of that groundwork. I don’t find it unbelievable that Obama set things up this way, but I DO find it unbelievable that nobody picked up on it prior to March 2017, when Ms Stefanik seemed to pick up on this? I shall continue with this article, as time permits, because it gives me some overview about how the American system operates……………………with not enough checks and balances.
It’s official.
All my “conspiracy theories” have been shown to be TRUE.
The Patriot Act and the Homeland Security were prepared and packaged by the Forth Branch, the deep state prior to 9/11. The Oklahoma City Bombing was a dry run. 9/11 was a vehicle to bring in far greater control over the people of this nation. Islamists were brought in as so much lipstick and mascara, easy to blame, hate or fear. But, most importantly they provided a smoke screen to hide the Deep State perps. The chemical, structural, metallurgical and engineering evidence of a complex explosive demolition by extremely skilled assassins is overwhelming. Over 5,000 licensed architects and engineers have concluded after thorough, unbiased research over 21 years, that 9/11 was controlled demolition. Military grade nano-thermite explosives were painstakingly placed to liquefy the steel beams of not the Twin Towers, but THREE TOWERS. Every ton of debris from all THREE TOWERS was found to contain the red crystals left behind by the nano-thermite explosives. The THIRD TOWER, Bldg. # 7 was totally untouched by a suicide smokescreen aircraft. Yet, all 748 feet and 50 floors fell in 7 seconds into its own footprint. See: Architects&Engineersfor9/11truth.
These deep staters were no amateur, bush leaguers, they were sophisticated with much to gain.
Quite frankly, Bill Shakespeare had it right. “More matter, and less art, Polonius.” –Hamlet’s mother.